IIYAMA PROLITE B2712HDS 27" MONITOR BACK IN STOCK

Soldato
Joined
17 Oct 2002
Posts
10,317
Location
Stoke
After being out of stock for a while, Iiyama's feature packed 27" monitor is back. It features impressive image quality, adjustable stand and DVI/HDMI connectivity.

Iiyama ProLite B2712HDS 27" Widescreen LCD Monitor @ £309.99 inc VAT

MO-054-IY_400.jpg


The Prolite B2712HDS-1 27” LCD Display is currently the largest screen offered by Iiyama. It features a stunning 2ms Response Time and High Definition 1920x1080 Resolution. The 50000:1 Advanced Contrast Ratio and 400cd/m² brightness offer the user clear and vivid images, and the HDMI and DVI connections ensure compatibility across a range of devices including games consoles and workstations. The ProLite B2712HDS has a height-adjustable stand with up to 30° rotation and up to 20° tilt.

- Height Adjustment: 85mm
- Swivel Stand: 60° (30° Left & 30° Right)
- Tilt Angle: 20° Up & 3° Down
- Screen Size: 27" Widescreen
- Resolution: 1920x1080
- Contrast Ratio: 50000:1
- Brightness: 400cd/m²
- Response Time: 2ms
- Viewing Angles (H/V): 170°/160°
- Colours: 16.7 Million
- Inputs: 1x Analogue, 1x DVI-D & 1x HDMI
- VESA Compliant
- Dimensions: 644.0mm x 422.5~507.5mm x 263.0mm
- Weight: 8.8kg
- Warranty: 3 Years On-Site

Only £309.99 inc VAT.

ORDER NOW
 
I don't see the appeal of this monitor - limited to 1080p, no display port, no portrait mode, useless internal speakers and £300+ for a dated TN panel. For this sort of money the HP ZR24w 24" makes more sense.
 
1. You can run 3 HPs in Eyefinity w/o an adapter.
2. Smaller screen with higher resolution = much sharper image.
3. IPS vs TN
4. Buying a cheaper HANNspree makes more sense.
 
1. You can run 3 HPs in Eyefinity w/o an adapter.
2. Smaller screen with higher resolution = much sharper image.
3. IPS vs TN
4. Buying a cheaper HANNspree makes more sense.

eyefinity is a very small market not enough to bring to the table, to compare regarding res there very little between them, panel wise fair enough though :)
 
eyefinity is a very small market not enough to bring to the table, to compare regarding res there very little between them, panel wise fair enough though :)

LAWYERD.
(smaller screen + 5000:1 contrast) < (bigger screen + 3000:1 contrast)
if you get me, I think is true.
And I'm still all for 1920 x 1080 > 1920 x 1200....
since am not such a gamer but a big video, movie, graphics editing(that one may not be true on the res size), that will always be true for me......
 
LAWYERD.
(smaller screen + 5000:1 contrast) < (bigger screen + 3000:1 contrast)
if you get me, I think is true.
And I'm still all for 1920 x 1080 > 1920 x 1200....
since am not such a gamer but a big video, movie, graphics editing(that one may not be true on the res size), that will always be true for me......

You can't be much into graphics editing, otherwise you'd be looking for the benefits of an IPS panel, verses a larger but inferior TN panel, where looking at it dead on will show colour gradients due to its size. Contrast ratios are a load of balls as well, they're all made up.

And don't get me started on 1080p... actually. I will. It annoys me that manufacturers are pandering to HD buzzwords in order to produce an inferior, squat resolution that is only beneficial when watching films. If I want to watch a film, I use a TV. I don't sit on an uncomfortable office chair, by myself, hunched over a desk, looking at some naff screen with HD READY stickers plastered all over it. ARGH!
 
Which has no HDMI, worse response rate, smaller screen and costs more....what exactly dosent make sence?

IPS > TN and by a large margin as well, TN is a good way of supplying cheap LCD panels but if your serious about your PC or gaming I wouldn't advise someone to waste time by pairing up a £300+ video with antiquated TN technology.
 
Back
Top Bottom