Recently i got flashed by a camera and received one of them conditional offers to do a speed awareness test now in-between the test and the first offence I got stopped by an officer who apparently got me on a laser doing 62 in a 50 zone (dual carriageway) going to work in the morning. I got a letter this morning saying that I'm to either pay 100.00 and 3 point or to go to court *note no speed indicated on the letter* (for the second offence).
Now as i'm thinking, is it worth disputing in court that i got the second fine in-between the test date and first offence I mean i can admit that speed was a problem for me but the course improved my knowledge greatly and now made me aware how to monitor my speed effectively hence i should be a good example that this public funded course is effective and working as i wont offend again.
what you think i should do?? worth disputing? what's the legal side of it (any legal people) OR should i just face the music and pay the fine plus points???
Many Thanks All
Now as i'm thinking, is it worth disputing in court that i got the second fine in-between the test date and first offence I mean i can admit that speed was a problem for me but the course improved my knowledge greatly and now made me aware how to monitor my speed effectively hence i should be a good example that this public funded course is effective and working as i wont offend again.
what you think i should do?? worth disputing? what's the legal side of it (any legal people) OR should i just face the music and pay the fine plus points???
Many Thanks All
Last edited: