I've read so many threads where people say that it's better to have 2 sticks than 4...why is this, what effect does it have on the system, why is 2x2Gb better than 4x1GB, i'm not a noob, just...well, don't know
From what I can gather from these forums, 4 x 1gb sticks put more load onto the memory controller...hence this...
"Note - If you select the 4GB Memory Upgrade option then the CPU overclock is reduced to 3.1GHz - 3.2GHz (*from 3.3Ghz) region to maintain stability with all four memory banks filled."
4x1 is better then 2x2. 4x1 will overclock better and is cheaper. moer then 4gb is not needed for gaming and by the time moer then 4gb is needed ddr3 will be mainstreme. Therefoer ther si no need to get 2x2gb thinking you will upgrade more later.
On the newer boards 4sticks doesn't affect overclocking as far as im aware. Well there is no significant difference.
i think its more down to the motherboards, some motherboards are not effected by using 4 sticks, some are better with just 2 banks filled. not sure which motherboards are better than the others for 4 sticks, but hopefully someone will know
2 sticks is easier on the mobo (theoritically) allowing fsb and hence cpu to be clocked higher but having 2x 2Gb sticks means you are sacrificing ram overclocks. But on the other hand having 4 sticks does not necessarily hinder your cpu overclock; I just got mine OCZ 2Gb platinum stuff today to add to my current 2Gb ballistix and I didn't have to lower the CPU clock or anything like that.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.