Associate
- Joined
- 15 Aug 2006
- Posts
- 1,764
- Location
- Leicester UK
Hi all,
A situation came up today where we recieved a bill from Getty Images for copyright infringement. It seems that former web developer used images from the internet to mark different sections of a website for us. Susequently, Getty Images have seen these images on our website and have sent us a bill for #800 per image.
Now, I know that copyright is important and should be enforced. I know that I would want to enforce it, if it ever came to be an issue to me. However, we've made contact with the web developer, who has since moved on to another job and they maintain that they 'always kept copyright in mind' and sourced the images from websites that they 'thought' were copyright free.
I know that the web guys ought to have a system in place to request and keep a record of copyright requests, but this isn't in place at the moment.
So what I was wondering is a) has anyone been on the recieving end of this b) is there any substance to their claims and c)what course of action would you take now?
It's also worth bearing in mind that we are a non-profit organisation, the images were thumbnail/icon size and weren't used on anything that generates any revenue at all.
A situation came up today where we recieved a bill from Getty Images for copyright infringement. It seems that former web developer used images from the internet to mark different sections of a website for us. Susequently, Getty Images have seen these images on our website and have sent us a bill for #800 per image.
Now, I know that copyright is important and should be enforced. I know that I would want to enforce it, if it ever came to be an issue to me. However, we've made contact with the web developer, who has since moved on to another job and they maintain that they 'always kept copyright in mind' and sourced the images from websites that they 'thought' were copyright free.
I know that the web guys ought to have a system in place to request and keep a record of copyright requests, but this isn't in place at the moment.
So what I was wondering is a) has anyone been on the recieving end of this b) is there any substance to their claims and c)what course of action would you take now?
It's also worth bearing in mind that we are a non-profit organisation, the images were thumbnail/icon size and weren't used on anything that generates any revenue at all.