Permabanned
- Joined
- 10 Dec 2008
- Posts
- 4,080
- Location
- London
I was playing GRID yesterday and noticed a load of billboards in-game for a cinema film that is only just coming out (way after GRID was released). It's in-game 'dynamic' advertising. The game had obviously gone to the internet (somewhere), grabbed the image, then put it on to the billboard in my game!
Some money has naturally gone to Codemasters for them to advertise that film to us, through 'in game' internet updating billboards..
Now, in fairness the billboard didn't reduce my enjoyment of the game at all (I don't care if the billboards flying past at 160mph advertise a fictional product, or a real one - although it may be messing with me subliminally?), and perhaps some of the cost charged by codemasters is being invested into .. er .. 'Grid 2' or something to make it even better (similar to product placement in films so they can afford an ) ...?
My question is this -- do you think such activities are totally wrong by codemasters? What about if they scream 'but we'll plow the money into future developments so GRID 2 will have 60 cars in it rather than 35??' does that excuse this behaviour?
Some money has naturally gone to Codemasters for them to advertise that film to us, through 'in game' internet updating billboards..
Now, in fairness the billboard didn't reduce my enjoyment of the game at all (I don't care if the billboards flying past at 160mph advertise a fictional product, or a real one - although it may be messing with me subliminally?), and perhaps some of the cost charged by codemasters is being invested into .. er .. 'Grid 2' or something to make it even better (similar to product placement in films so they can afford an ) ...?
My question is this -- do you think such activities are totally wrong by codemasters? What about if they scream 'but we'll plow the money into future developments so GRID 2 will have 60 cars in it rather than 35??' does that excuse this behaviour?