• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

inno3D GTX 970 OC Overheating Fix

Associate
Joined
7 Oct 2014
Posts
107
Location
Merseyside
Crossposting this in case anyone finds they have a similar problem... another user deadman74 later noticed my card had a lack of a cutout for the DVI socket covers, so it may have just been my card or I may be a colossal pillock in some way. However if you are having overheating problems with this card, you may want to give this a read. :)

The other day I took delivery of a inno3D GTX 970 OC. Main reason I chose this card was it being among the shortest high performance cards I saw on the market (useful for mITX builds :P). Unfortunately no reviews were avaliable at the time but how bad could a long standing brand like inno3D be?

2WdZeaZ.jpg

After installing the card and booting, I went straight into BF4, pushed the settings to Ultra 1920x1080 and with MSI Afterburner running, went to play starting with Tashgar... :)

cw3lYyo.jpg

Quickly the temp hit 80, the fans hit a pretty loud 2500RPM and the clock dropped from the turbo limit of 1240 down to 1088. The game went jittery and I was puzzled. Surely this card doesn't run this hot and surely it runs faster than this. But it was late and I called it a day. Repeated it a couple days later and still the same problem.

Then I thought **** it, let's try repasting. Then while it was sitting in the case, I noticed something odd. The card looked bent. I took it out and lo, it was indeed not right.

B18zzwn.jpg

The problem I found was the black plastic bracket on the end of the HSF assembly. This was pressing up on the metal covers for the DVI sockets.

qDmNVF3.jpg

This was potentially affecting cooling as you can see the paste on one end doesn't seem to have sat close enough to displace it and there is still quite a thick layer there.

UPDSxAV.jpg

Disassembled the card and took that part out. Now it sits much better.

GyviRCh.jpg
NdfGf98.jpg
JSrIyz2.jpg

Bonus pics; The contact between the block and the heat pipes.

hAaOBUs.jpg

Whole card heatspreader for various components including the memory.

7K5I99I.jpg

At the same spot in Tashgar, the card is capable of maintaining its boost frequency, with heavy use and sits below 80. The card is slightly quieter as well as going over 80% fan use seems to throw the card into whirlwind mode. Whereas previously it could barely play normally with low use scenes and etc. without running up against the temp limit, it is pretty reasonable now. :)

3bLRFfq.jpg

So if you have an inno3D GTX970 OC, you may consider this fix which offers more performance, better cooling and a quieter card. If you were looking at a GTX 970, you may want to think twice about this model. :)

Also my reply after deadman74 noticed the problem...

You are right! I went back and had a look, the other black plastic bracket does indeed have what appears to be a cutout. Odd thing is, this heatsink assembly can only go on one way given the power cable for the fans sits to one side. And it doesn't make sense either because the cutout is on the same side which caused the problem in the first place, which means if it was flipped to the other side, it would be in the wrong place.

Does anyone else have this problem and have I missed anything? :confused:
 
Oops I'm late to the party. With regard to why I didn't just return it, I refer to the original post where I raised the possibility of being a massive pillock. I guess it's all but certain now. :P

@MasterOC; this is only my second or third Inno3D card, as I tend to change maker every generation just to get a feel for the field and to try the different specialist coolers manufacturers use (Herculez, DirectCUII, Windforce, TwinFrozr, etc.) So I cannot really comment on reliability other than I still have a inno3D GeForce 4 MX 440 in a box somewhere which ran well but I got rid of my last AGP system a fair while ago. :D

@ubersonic; Your 970 had the cut out in the right place as I can see in your pic and your thermal paste is more spread. What is with the DVD case in your PC? Like the setup though, how many generations of hardware has that case seen? :P With such a thick and large rad up top, does the 120 down below contribute much? Just wondering because of the additional piping and technicalities of getting it set up.

@Mr crowley; can you post pics too? I'm curious what you mean by 'diagonal'. :confused:

@stooeh, can we have a closer look at your top card? Bottom one looks ok, but top one looks odd but that may be the camera angle.

Thanks for the kind comment pgi947 and thanks for looking into it Gibbo. :)
 
Last edited:
Oops I'm late to the party. With regard to why I didn't just return it, I refer to the original post where I raised the possibility of being a massive pillock. I guess it's all but certain now. :P

@MasterOC; this is only my second or third Inno3D card, as I tend to change maker every generation just to get a feel for the field and to try the different specialist coolers manufacturers use (Herculez, DirectCUII, Windforce, TwinFrozr, etc.) So I cannot really comment on reliability other than I still have a inno3D GeForce 4 MX 440 in a box somewhere which ran well but I got rid of my last AGP system a fair while ago. :D

@ubersonic; Your 970 had the cut out in the right place as I can see in your pic and your thermal paste is more spread. What is with the DVD case in your PC? Like the setup though, how many generations of hardware has that case seen? :P With such a thick and large rad up top, does the 120 down below contribute much? Just wondering because of the additional piping and technicalities of getting it set up.

@Mr crowley; can you post pics too? I'm curious what you mean by 'diagonal'. :confused:

@stooeh, can we have a closer look at your top card? Bottom one looks ok, but top one looks odd but that may be the camera angle.

Thanks for the kind comment pgi947 and thanks for looking into it Gibbo. :)

edit: Sorry for double post. :(
 
Back
Top Bottom