• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Intel 10th Gen Comet Lake thread

Panos said:
No is not. Just normal boost clocks and hits 325W. Trying to push all core 5.2Ghz and would go over 450W easily. And even with 360mm AIO the temps are hitting boiling point (100C).

Thats why 11 series is out in just 6 months from now with new Z590 motherboards and top chip 8 core CPU.

And for what? Is already slower than the 3900X let alone the 3950X and won't be able to compete against the 4000 series in just 4 months time.

10000 series is not good as the rumours suggest and going to be very short lived also. Anyone buying it knowingly full well that 11th series is just 5 months away isn't a consumer.
Click to expand...

9900K/KS is already faster at gaming than Ryzen, though only by a few percent. These 10th gen chips will further extend that lead.

Quite disappointing that AMD can't even beat Intel at gaming with a brand new architecture/process, while Intel is still using 5 year old architecture and process.
 
Dave2150 said:
9900K/KS is already faster at gaming than Ryzen, though only by a few percent. These 10th gen chips will further extend that lead.

Quite disappointing that AMD can't even beat Intel at gaming with a brand new architecture/process, while Intel is still using 5 year old architecture and process.
Click to expand...

"though only by a few percent" yep that is true. But the "halo" 10th gen chip will only beat Ryzen if you are using a very strong single stage unit, or LN2..................................so really you are are talking complete rubbish.
 
Last edited:
Dave2150 said:
9900K/KS is already faster at gaming than Ryzen, though only by a few percent. These 10th gen chips will further extend that lead.

Quite disappointing that AMD can't even beat Intel at gaming with a brand new architecture/process, while Intel is still using 5 year old architecture and process.
Click to expand...

Laptops would like a word, cause right now not a single intel cpu can beat an AMD cpu at gaming in laptops
 
Dave2150 said:
9900K/KS is already faster at gaming than Ryzen, though only by a few percent. These 10th gen chips will further extend that lead.

Quite disappointing that AMD can't even beat Intel at gaming with a brand new architecture/process, while Intel is still using 5 year old architecture and process.
Click to expand...

Doesnt the 3800/3900/3950 only lose out to clock speed deficits ?
 
Grim5 said:
Laptops would like a word, cause right now not a single intel cpu can beat an AMD cpu at gaming in laptops
Click to expand...

Take a look at the thread title buddy, "Desktop".

Though I will humour you. Last I checked there were no AMD laptops with anything more powerful than a RTX 2060, so Intel automatically wins with the 2070 and 2080 MaxQ laptops (for gaming).
 
Dave2150 said:
Take a look at the thread title buddy, "Desktop".

Though I will humour you. Last I checked there were no AMD laptops with anything more powerful than a RTX 2060, so Intel automatically wins with the 2070 and 2080 MaxQ laptops (for gaming).
Click to expand...

that's gpu performance, I'm talking about cpu gaming performance so try again, buddy
 
Last edited:
It looks like the tide is already turning. Microsoft studios are already optimising games for Zen 2 architecture so they get easily ported to the Series X come November.

the latest game, Gears Tactics runs so well on Zen 2 that in some instances a ryzen 3600 is spanking the 9900k. Can't be long now till the rest of the developers follow suit.

 
Last edited:
Dave2150 said:
9900K/KS is already faster at gaming than Ryzen, though only by a few percent. These 10th gen chips will further extend that lead.

Quite disappointing that AMD can't even beat Intel at gaming with a brand new architecture/process, while Intel is still using 5 year old architecture and process.
Click to expand...

Stop writing crap please. That applies only when someone is using a 2080Ti at 1080p.
 
Dave2150 said:
9900K/KS is already faster at gaming than Ryzen, though only by a few percent. These 10th gen chips will further extend that lead.

Quite disappointing that AMD can't even beat Intel at gaming with a brand new architecture/process, while Intel is still using 5 year old architecture and process.
Click to expand...
They won't be competing against Ryzen 3000 though...
 
Grim5 said:
that's gpu performance, I'm talking about cpu gaming performance so try again, buddy
Click to expand...

I think you should read my post, and then your post again.

Firstly, this is the desktop CPU thread, not laptop. When I correct you, and advise that Intel is still king of mobile gaming performance on laptops, you can't seem to accept it. I'll try break it down for you buddy:

Gaming performance is primarily based on GPU performance. You can't buy a AMD Ryzen laptop with anything better than a RTX 2060, so Intel will automatically win, no matter how good the Ryzen 4000 mobile CPU's are. This is for gaming of course. So your point is moot - for laptop gaming performance at the high end, Intel is the only player and has the best gaming performance.

You'll also mind the vast majority of AMD laptops have 'bad' displays, while the Intel ones have the premium 100% SRGB IPS displays, further crippling AMD.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom