Soldato
- Joined
- 5 Sep 2011
- Posts
- 12,876
- Location
- Surrey
He works for Caseking, the people who own OCUK, for all intents and purposes he is, and did target the manufacturers directly, asking them to fix the VRM cooling solution, he was not trying to create drama, just stop customer backlash.
No idea why my previous quote didn't pick up your whole post.
I wasn't targeting your prime comment to be fair, only whats seems like complete denial or that it was irrelevant to everyone since who uses AVX/2/512? The use of vector operations may be very important to some people, and I am sure many more programs will be using it more extensively as the CPU's with AVX capabilities are now more widespread.
Anyhow, yes we know - you don't care, but this forum is read by people that may care, and find it informative and relevant to their purchases and builds.
The current draw is what it is. If you want to overclock and your workload consists of AVX2/512 then concessions need to be made, with or without revised VRM cooling. Intel themselves acknowledge this with the introduction of AVX offset. If you truly want to pull 350W through the die just to make sure "you can", then that's the users prerogative.
Truth be told it wasn't so much him calling the vendors out, more so him working with the vendor at that particular time.