Caporegime
- Joined
- 9 Nov 2009
- Posts
- 25,773
- Location
- Planet Earth
Its the dGPU version of the Intel IGP:
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Can we presume that Intel are trying to become 10nm binning champions with this one so they don't have to dump parts where the CPU is broken?
The only interesting bench was that it outperforms the integrated Iris in the i7-1165G7 which is actually the 95EU version of this AFAIK.
The other thing of interest is that it is passive, but then I've not paid much attention to GT 1030s or R550s.
You can get up to passive GTX 1650s, look up Palit Kalmx. AMD partners don't seem to be as interested, but not just the RX 550 but the 560 could most definitely be passively cooled at stock clocks.
So complicated in the naming structure etc he had to keep referring to his script. No hard conclusions.
Well yeah there is one its pap. Just buy a GT 1030 but make sure its the DDR5 version not DDR4.
Only market I can see them aiming this at is AMD CPU system builders.
If Intel do bring out the whatever its called serious Desktop Gaming Discrete GPU dont think it will set the world on fire and I dont think AMD or Nvidia have anything to worry about at the moment.
Aren't they working on a proper gaming card?
Depends if they can do rx5700 performance around £200 that will put the cat among the pigeons
yes but its still believe it when we see it after the false starts before.
I think that is just a pipe dream at that price.
More likely be something around rx 580
Well right now theres nothing available / worth buying in the midrange at current prices, so even if Intel manage to get something out thats around 1660 performance for under £200 and sort the drivers out, it will sell well.
Intel won't hit top end performance for sure, but if they come in with compelling price/performance for the low-mid range they could clean up. It's where the volume is.
tis true but then if its where the volume is why are AMD or Nvidia not touching that space ?
I think the demand for their high end (and high margin) silicon has been so ridiculously high, combined with limited production capacity, that they have surmised they can make more money directing what capacity they have to the high end. This thinking has likely also driven AMD to not offer non-X 5000 series CPU's as of yet too.
Thats the other thing with Intel, they might bring out a £200 price per performance card but then AMD and Nvidia will just release what they have in the wings and kill it off.