Caporegime
- Joined
- 9 Nov 2009
- Posts
- 25,748
- Location
- Planet Earth
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Probably aimed at forcing a more favourable deal from nVidia.
Kinda leaps off the page, doesn't it?
so what does this all mean? Will the Intel igpu's will be better with full DX12 hardware support? Could they rival AMD APU performance? Or have they realised AMD VR support will be better.
I remember 8Pack stating in a thread on here prior to the release of skylake that he had spoken with various Intel engineers and reccomended the removal of the igpu on k series chips. Savings could have been spent on improvements to the thermal issues on such cpu's.
Heads AMD Wins, Tails Nvidia LosesSummary
The unconfirmed Bloomberg article that said INTC might make a deal with AMD for GPU IP technology is probably true, once we connect the dots.
And if such a deal were to go through, AMD will be a clear-cut winner and NVDA a momentary loser.
AMD might end up being profitable soon, with zero debt as a result of the deal, which might elevate its stock to $10 or more.
Its not really about the hardware - and while less relevant to integrated GPUs, etc. on low end stuff the factor that doesn't work so well with Intel is the software side - they tend to have an approach to software development that is more kind of get it right first time then leave it alone which doesn't really work for GPUs.