http://tech.slashdot.org/story/16/0...ps-to-become-slower-but-more-energy-efficient
Not sure what to think about this. For most enthusiasts they don't really care about power consumption they just want the best possible speeds. I can see how the mass market wouldn't care so much about speed and would rather have power efficient chips.
But the gaming market is completely different to the mass market. People who buy a system with an APU because it is cheap and includes an integrated GPU to save even more money are going to want power efficient systems. Those looking to spend £800+ on a CPU are not going to care about power efficiency in the least all they'll look for is top of the range speed and good overclocking ability.
Yes I am aware that the more power a chip uses the more heat it generates and therefore the slower it overclocks but Intel seem to be managing OK at the moment. I don't see why we would need to go backwards in terms of performance.
Not sure what to think about this. For most enthusiasts they don't really care about power consumption they just want the best possible speeds. I can see how the mass market wouldn't care so much about speed and would rather have power efficient chips.
But the gaming market is completely different to the mass market. People who buy a system with an APU because it is cheap and includes an integrated GPU to save even more money are going to want power efficient systems. Those looking to spend £800+ on a CPU are not going to care about power efficiency in the least all they'll look for is top of the range speed and good overclocking ability.
Yes I am aware that the more power a chip uses the more heat it generates and therefore the slower it overclocks but Intel seem to be managing OK at the moment. I don't see why we would need to go backwards in terms of performance.