Soldato
- Joined
- 24 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 6,242
- Location
- Portsmouth
I'm looking to build a new pc in the next 9 months and I'm weighing up a X79-E build or waiting a little longer for P/H78 & Ivy Bridge
I'm kind of curious about the X79-E though, reading about I don't really see the point. It has massive bandwidth and a quad channel memory controller, but yet it doesn't support technologies like USB3 or PCI-E 3.0. What's the point in launching a new chipset that is already out of date on paper?
Do you think it's better to avoid this and go for the more mainstream Ivy Bridge? I remember reading an article comparing Sandy Bridge to i7/X58 setups and despite only having a dual channel memory controller SB was quicker...
I'm kind of curious about the X79-E though, reading about I don't really see the point. It has massive bandwidth and a quad channel memory controller, but yet it doesn't support technologies like USB3 or PCI-E 3.0. What's the point in launching a new chipset that is already out of date on paper?
Do you think it's better to avoid this and go for the more mainstream Ivy Bridge? I remember reading an article comparing Sandy Bridge to i7/X58 setups and despite only having a dual channel memory controller SB was quicker...