Associate
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2010
- Posts
- 26
- Location
- currently Bournemouth uk
Whats the general consensus?
WHAT?!?!?!?! and LOL
It depends who you talk to eh?
A lot and I mean a lot of virtualisation customers go with AMD over Intel.
Certain workloads are much better suited to AMDs architecture - I for one will stick with AMD for our production farms - Intel goes where we dont care as much about the server, bless.
Edit: Do your kit "servers" have dual psu's and hot swap disks? If not, they are not servers IMO. Just an observation.
Ah, yes.
Just ask one of your engineers John...![]()
No mention of what sort of disks and RAID controller that are being used?
On the info given I'd agree that I'd use a box like that for a small SBS install maybe, if that, but not much else. I wouldn't want to use those for much more than a handful of people.
Why should someone use one of your built boxes rather than purchasing one from HP/Dell etc complete with all the support you get from them?
What makes you stand out as a choice for people to make over them?
Is 3 HDDs the max that you can fit in the server? If it is you can't claim to support RAID 10 as it needs a minimum of four disks...
LOL i put SATA just because there was'nt any specific brand manufacturerthose are sata drives, yeh?![]()