Soldato
As the title suggests really...
Inzumam has been banned for 4 ODIs for bringing the game into disrepute. This relates to his decision to refuse to resume play in the 4th test. He has been found not guilty of ball tampering.
This is the right decision imo. There has been no clear proof of any ball tampering so it is entirely right that inzy was found not guilty of that. The fact remains, however, that his actions in refusing to play were clearly unacceptable and had to be punished. Regardless of the nature of the accusations, such a move is unsporting imo and also ruins a day of sport for those watching. Cricket is, it should not be forgotten, a spectator sport and refusing to play in such circumstances neglects this.
Inzumam has been banned for 4 ODIs for bringing the game into disrepute. This relates to his decision to refuse to resume play in the 4th test. He has been found not guilty of ball tampering.
This is the right decision imo. There has been no clear proof of any ball tampering so it is entirely right that inzy was found not guilty of that. The fact remains, however, that his actions in refusing to play were clearly unacceptable and had to be punished. Regardless of the nature of the accusations, such a move is unsporting imo and also ruins a day of sport for those watching. Cricket is, it should not be forgotten, a spectator sport and refusing to play in such circumstances neglects this.