• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Is 1900 X 1200 DirectX 10 realistic???

chaparral said:
But Nvidia/ATI didn't built Vista :p

For 1920x1200 res gaming you need really need a overclocked 8800gts min with only a single card setup...

My last card was a x1900xt-x and this was not fast enough for 1920x1200 gaming on my dell 24" monitor..

Unless you don't mind running your games with low detail settings..
which i don't see the point in splashing out hundreds of pounds on a system and 24" monitor to play at low detail settings...
Click to expand...
I'm currently playing quake 4, halo 2 and lost planet dx10 in 1920x1200 no problem, card is a 8800 gts 640mb @ 648/2ghz
 
I know it's a luxury people have gotten used to as dx9 matured, but it isn't an absolute requirement to play games with every detail setting ramped right up to the max, oh and let's not forget the obligatory 4xAA, 16xAF.

I'd say gaming at 1900x1200 in dx10 is very much possible, you might not get every single bit of eye candy that you desire but I'm willing to bet it will play well and still look bloody amazing.
 
Interview Bit-tech.net: TWIMTBP, DX10 and beyond

Roy Taylor, Nvidia Vice President of worldwide GPU sales.

Based on Roy’s answer, I decided to ask some more general questions about DirectX 10 performance, as Nvidia’s Tony Tamasi, Vice President of Technical Marketing, and David Blythe, one of Microsoft's Graphics Architects, both talked about efficiency improvements and API overhead reductions in DX10. However, with the first crop of DirectX 10 games (namely Lost Planet, Call of Juarez and Company of Heroes), we’ve seen some pretty massive performance drops for some relatively small image quality benefits over what the DirectX 9.0 versions offer.

Roy was quick to point out that “it’s important to note that the massive performance titles you’ve mentioned are results from games that are early looks rather than reflective of the first wave of first generation titles.” Roy continued, telling us that some more betas would be coming out in the next two months, with full game launches starting as early as August. He then revealed that “the experiences with those will be very different for a number of reasons.”

Naturally, the next question was: why are those titles going to be different?

“Developers wishing to use DX10 have a number of choices to make. But the biggest is whether to layer over a DX9 title some additional DX10 effects or to decide to design for DX10 from the ground up. Both take work but one is faster to get to market than the other. It’s less a question of whether DX10 is working optimally on GeForce 8-series GPUs and more a case of how is DX10 being used. To use it well – and efficiently – requires development time.

“Tony and David are right, there are API reductions, massive AA is ‘almost free’ with DX10. This is why we are able to offer CSAA [up to 16xAA] with new DX10 titles – the same thing with DX9 just isn’t practical. AA makes things pretty but what we really want to see from DX10 – and what DX10 offers is the chance to do things we haven’t seen before. For example the full use of DX10 stated instancing to produce huge, I mean really huge crowd scenes. That’s possible and could be used in many ways to affect game play. There are so many others.”

I couldn't let him leave me on a cliffhanger there, so I asked if he could elaborate a bit more on that...

“Sure, imagine this; you are in charge of an anti-aircraft gun, you’re surrounded and waiting for help. Suddenly you can hear an aircraft approach, you look up but bright sunlight and clouds obscure your vision (god rays [volumetric light rays streaming through trees and clouds], volumetric clouds, HDR) you can see a plane approach but you don’t know whether to shoot. Then suddenly, the clouds pass behind the plane and hide the sun (because they can, they are volumetric!) and it’s one of yours! Hooray, it sweeps down and begins blowing up the hordes (there are many because we have instancing!) of enemy tanks. As the pilot flies by, he waves at you because you can clearly see his facial features behind the glass – that’s what DX10 can bring.

“So yes we will see big performance jumps in DX10 and Vista as we improve drivers but to keep looking at that area is to really miss the point about DX10. It’s not about – and it was never about – running older games at faster frame rates. PC Gamers weren’t getting antsy demanding Far Cry run at 200 fps instead of 100 fps – what PC gamers want are better, more immersive, compelling PC games. DX10 is going to give them that – it was never invented to make games they’ve already played and moved on from just run faster.”
Click to expand...


 
Last edited:
Wasnt that the game where every body on this forum didnt like the scale of the tatical nukes. I think its an rts game.
 
The game is World in Conflict.

I think it will run well on GTS/GTX and the 2900XT. I seen a video review a good few months ago and it was running fine on what I think was the GTX.
 
“Developers wishing to use DX10 have a number of choices to make. But the biggest is whether to layer over a DX9 title some additional DX10 effects or to decide to design for DX10 from the ground up. Both take work but one is faster to get to market than the other. It’s less a question of whether DX10 is working optimally on GeForce 8-series GPUs and more a case of how is DX10 being used. To use it well – and efficiently – requires development time."
Click to expand...
Interesting point this as there are quite a few people on this forum who have repeatedly stated there is no difference between development from the ground up in DX10 vs bolting it on to a DX9 game.

I guess we know now there is :D

“Sure, imagine this; you are in charge of an anti-aircraft gun, you’re surrounded and waiting for help. Suddenly you can hear an aircraft approach, you look up but bright sunlight and clouds obscure your vision (god rays [volumetric light rays streaming through trees and clouds], volumetric clouds, HDR) you can see a plane approach but you don’t know whether to shoot. Then suddenly, the clouds pass behind the plane and hide the sun (because they can, they are volumetric!) and it’s one of yours! Hooray, it sweeps down and begins blowing up the hordes (there are many because we have instancing!) of enemy tanks. As the pilot flies by, he waves at you because you can clearly see his facial features behind the glass – that’s what DX10 can bring."
Click to expand...
Lol, he's very enthusiastic - I was expecting him to mention Jesus popping up in the scene at any moment. Of course, that would really kill your frame rate.
 
eracer2006 said:
What game is that ?

I cant see an 8800 GTX doing that!
Click to expand...

what the hell are they running all the videos of it on then :confused:

Its out in a month or too aswell. Its got be running on a gtx or ultra as they are the fastest out at the moment.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom