• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Is anything more than i3 really needed for your average gamer?

Associate
Joined
8 Aug 2015
Posts
41
I'm curious to gather opinions on the price-performance relationships of i5 and i7 processors over i3 processors. Given that price increments between processors being within the region of £100-£200. And taking into account longevity and whether the delay of upgrading an i3 in x years could be offset by investing in an i5/i7 and upgrading in x+n years.

I'm having difficulty as I can now afford to build an i7 spec system but having trouble determining if I need an i7 and being ~£300 better off.

Thanks
 
No reason other than not being familiar with AMD - Thank you though, I'll look into it.

Does this also apply for comparisons between i7 and an AMD equivalent in the upper price range?
 
The first thing you need to do for a question like this is define what you mean by average gamer.

So for example Assasin's Creed Odyssey. I just like being able to play latest titles comfortably. Nothing really competitive - not looking for high FPS or anything.

I'm looking to go 4k - So 4k where possible.

With opting for a 4k build it's already looking pretty pricey, so I'm considering where else the fat could be trimmed.

FPS doesn't matter a great deal to me, as long it's comfortable to play.
 
What is your current spec? A lot of these questions can be answered by using your current system to demonstrate the requirements and shortfalls.

i3 4330 with a gtx 960 which has served me very well. However, it's having trouble running some of the latest titles smoothly. And I'm really keen to go 4K.

With regards to budget, I haven't yet established one. I could afford to go all out and buy 'the best of everything' but that seems wasteful - What I'm aiming to do is establish the best price-performance ratio. I could technically say I'm willing to spend £3000 but I wouldn't see that as a goal to find the best of everything for within £3000. If that makes sense? I don't want a bull doing a mouses work.

My main concerns are longevity with regards to future proofing and having a system which handles everything I play well.

@'Wez - I certainly need to take the time to look in to Ryzen - I've always had intel systems and so I guess I've just become a bit of a creature of habit.
 
Back
Top Bottom