I can see I have Ultrafast available to me (1000mbps) mainly because I'm only a couple a hundred meters from the cabinet. If you have a bad connection then it won't be worth getting a faster package regardless.
I wouldn't say £5 more a month is a lot more. Which is what I'm paying for doubling my previous speeds.It is good and tends to be more reliable than fttc but costs a lot more so probably not worth it overall.
It's about 20/month more here.I wouldn't say £5 more a month is a lot more. Which is what I'm paying for doubling my previous speeds.
I've also wondered about this. I think for the average home user who streams, plays the occasional video game, works from home then FTTC is ideal.
I'm struggling to see the benefits for anyone that fits that category quite franklyy . I'd still want it if the price was right, being able to download a game 4-10x as fast is appealing. Outside of that I wouldn't even notice :/
Great for those who do professional work at home i.e. uploading large files, drive replication as others have mentioned
It's about 20/month more here.
Does not seem true here. We're all paying about 50 a month for fttp and the alternative is 1mb adsl.Eh? BT has the same prices for FTTP as it does FTTC if you are in a FTTP area.
Eh? BT has the same prices for FTTP as it does FTTC if you are in a FTTP area. There does seem to be this odd misconception that BT doesn't do FTTP below 150. I think the consfusion comes about as they use the same name for the FTTC product as the FTTP product.
For reference there most subscribed package on FTTP (before the 1gbps days) was the 40/50 mbps tier they had over 90% of subscribers on that, and is probably why they priced the 900mbps so low as they were thinking there wouldn't be many takers.
Not the same here, FTTC packages stop at £31.99 for 67MB Fibre 2, then Full Fibre 100 is £39.99.
Not the same here, FTTC packages stop at £31.99 for 67MB Fibre 2, then Full Fibre 100 is £39.99.