Associate
- Joined
- 11 Apr 2006
- Posts
- 1,176
- Location
- by the sea
The point I was trying to make is that because all food is organic, it would have been more sensible to think of an alternative name for food that does not contain pesticides etc. I understand entirely the meaning behind the phrase 'organic food'.
It seems my point has gone over several peoples heads.
let's not argue about semantics
if you buy food labeled as organic, it will be pesticide and chemical free
you understand that phrase, everyone who purchases it understands what they are buying
so why change it? or make an issue about the fact that it could be interpreted in another way?
anyway,
on topic
i don't understand how people can stand to buy non free range meat / eggs
it may as well say 'cruelly kept, poorly treated meat from caged / unhappy animals'
if you're going to eat meat, you should at least take notice and have a bit of morality when choosing what you purchase
just my 2 pence

Last edited: