Is this Gap advert racist?

Associate
Joined
22 Sep 2014
Posts
757
Location
South somewhere
Sorry if this is a repost.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-trending-35968787

O4oO9Jk.jpg


BBC "News"

What do you see in this picture?
Four young friends posing playfully for the camera? Another forgettable marketing campaign? Or a glaring example of a type of passive racism that persists across corporate America?

That's the debate that's been playing out online in response to an advert for a new clothing line - a collaboration between Gap and Ellen DeGeneres. The advert has provoked such stinging criticism that the company has now apologised and said it will pull the image from its campaign.

It's the tall white girl resting her arm on the head of the shorter black girl that has triggered the controversy. For some it's insulting and, if not intentionally racist, at least reflective of a lack of thought on Gap's part (hence the term "passive" racism). For others, the image is harmless, and the backlash against it ridiculous.

Writing in The Root, a black culture magazine, Kirsten West Savali argues that the advert compounds "the feeling that our black bodies are undervalued and positioned to serve as props upon which white bodies can be better appreciated and admired." For her the critical reaction on social media was most definitely "valid".

Zeba Blay, writing in the Huffington Post, argued that the issue was complicated, and warranted further consideration. "My initial reaction was not 'this is racist!' " she wrote, but added that it was unfair to say those who took issue were overreacting. "It's not the pose itself that is the problem, but the context in which it is delivered." The intense reaction the advert provoked in so many people was a result of a media landscape where there are "so few powerful representations of black women and especially black girls," and so in that context it's no wonder that so many people found it offensive, Blay wrote.

As a result of the negative publicity Gap has acted. In a statement issued on Monday the company said: "As a brand with a proud 46-year history of championing diversity and inclusivity, we appreciate the conversation that has taken place and are sorry to anyone we've offended. This GapKids campaign highlights true stories of talented girls who are celebrating creative self-expression and sharing their messages of empowerment. We are replacing the image with a different shot from the campaign, which encourages girls (and boys) everywhere to be themselves and feel pride in what makes them unique."

tldr: No.


I despair for the human race if everyone is this easily offended.
 
Did you see the older version with the Black girl leaning on the White one, apparently thats fine because she's pulling a different face and doesn't passively oppress anybody.

Ridiculous.
 
Reshoot the ad and have the tall white girl kneeling down whilst the black girl puts her elbow on her head. Fixed and not a single **** give that the black girl is leaning on a white one.

I can only assume that some peoples job is to find things to be offended about.
 
I suppose they could have put her arm around her...

but there's no boys so it's definitely sexist.

Something that does stand out to me: how awesome is that girl doing a handstand and crossing her legs? I can't imagine how the hell she stays up (really hoping she's not propped!).
 
" Black Lives Matter "
They matter so much, that everyone else is racist ;)

Apparently this is a common/popular phrase in the US. I asked some American friends about it, but they weren't keen on discussing the issue.

Just wondered how come it's always 'Black' lives that matter in 'White America', but never the lives of Mexicans, Brazillians, Japanese, Indians or the many other 'pure' and mixed races that also make up the nation?
 
I spent 5 mins trying to work out if they were spelling something racist with their poses and i just couldn't see it.


So... no.

I am offended that they didn't include a gender confused giraffe, as they are free to wear whatever they want without being labelled or assigned to gender/animal roles.
 
Back
Top Bottom