Jacob Rees-Mogg Redux

It saves millions of lives. And then the long term aim is about trying to help stabilise countries so you have fewer refugees and migrants, a better trading partner in the future, etc.
I think we need to be able to clearly separate gov2gov foreign aid from the work done by charities.

What evidence is there that gov2gov foreign aid in Africa has done anything other than find its way to corrupt officials? It is the African govts who decide how to spend the gov2gov money. They don't get it all, some of it goes through the UN, etc. (The UN being known for their amazing efficiency and not wasting millions on their own bureaucracy:

https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/616594/foreign-aid-Cameron-Britain-Syrian-refugees-wasted-UN).

The foreign aid situation is laughable tbh.
 
Delivering a Daily Express petition to No. 10 is pretty much the best way to kill your political credibility.

This plummy, neo-feudalist, High Tory gimp was born into a life of wealth and privilege. He has no comprehension of life in the real world, which is why most of his views are firmly based in the 18th century.
 
Delivering a Daily Express petition to No. 10 is pretty much the best way to kill your political credibility.

This plummy High Tory gimp was born into a life of wealth and privilege. He has no comprehension of life in the real world, which is why most of his views are firmly based in the 18th century.
Gets my vote.
 
Delivering a Daily Express petition to No. 10 is pretty much the best way to kill your political credibility.

This plummy, neo-feudalist, High Tory gimp was born into a life of wealth and privilege. He has no comprehension of life in the real world, which is why most of his views are firmly based in the 18th century.
These days I'm genuinely not sure who's worse.

Put the true-blue Tories in charge and you'd have a structured, functional society. One where the poor starved and the rich and powerful ruled with an iron fist.

But put the "liberal" SJW types in charge and you'd have anarchy. I imagine we'd very quickly become something approximating Syria or Afghanistan. Because their ideals fit with reality like broken glass fits well in cheese sandwich.

Alternatively you might end up with the UKSSR.

Neither outcome is useful to me. Both sides are repellent.
 
Delivering a Daily Express petition to No. 10 is pretty much the best way to kill your political credibility.

This plummy, neo-feudalist, High Tory gimp was born into a life of wealth and privilege. He has no comprehension of life in the real world, which is why most of his views are firmly based in the 18th century.

He gets around unlike some mps.


 
It saves millions of lives.
Not my problem. We take care of our bit of the planet, and they can take care of theirs.

And then the long term aim is about trying to help stabilise countries so you have fewer refugees and migrants...
We have a bought and paid for army that can stop them. We shouldn't have to pay deadbeats not to come here.

...a better trading partner in the future, etc.
The only thing they produce is people they can't feed. Let China deal with them.
 
Not my problem. We take care of our bit of the planet, and they can take care of theirs.


We have a bought and paid for army that can stop them. We shouldn't have to pay deadbeats not to come here.


The only thing they produce is people they can't feed. Let China deal with them.

It is cruel to keep giving them just enough to stay where they are, they need to make own way in the world. Do you think they would be so forthcoming if reality was reversed.
 
Back
Top Bottom