30 Jan 2006 at 14:06 #1 mattup mattup Associate Joined 10 Jan 2006 Posts 826 Location Reading As the title says, thinking a 4400x2 might be better due to the 11 multi. Any views please? Matt
30 Jan 2006 at 14:08 #2 lemonkettaz lemonkettaz Soldato Joined 28 Nov 2005 Posts 13,001 i think its 6 and 2 3s with them processors.
30 Jan 2006 at 14:09 #3 mattup mattup Associate OP Joined 10 Jan 2006 Posts 826 Location Reading Well thats helped me loads, although I know what you are saying is true. Matt
30 Jan 2006 at 14:45 #4 kdd kdd Soldato Joined 29 Oct 2005 Posts 3,818 Location Kent Most people seem to be getting 2.5-6 from opty dual cores so you haven't exactly made a terrible error. If you paid less than 4400+ price then hey.
Most people seem to be getting 2.5-6 from opty dual cores so you haven't exactly made a terrible error. If you paid less than 4400+ price then hey.
30 Jan 2006 at 14:49 #5 matt100 matt100 Soldato Joined 31 Jul 2004 Posts 13,679 Location Surrey I don't use the 11 multi on my 4400.. 265x10 all the way baby! seriously though, with the memory you've got you should be fine to use 10.
I don't use the 11 multi on my 4400.. 265x10 all the way baby! seriously though, with the memory you've got you should be fine to use 10.
30 Jan 2006 at 15:39 #6 kdd kdd Soldato Joined 29 Oct 2005 Posts 3,818 Location Kent yeh 10 multi will work out better most likely.
