Which is exactly what they have done. They have removed themselves, control their media appearances, and challenge lies in the media and invasions of privacy. But for some reason people hate them for it.
Keeping up with the Markles
- Thread starter antijoke
- Start date
Which is exactly what they have done. They have removed themselves, control their media appearances, and challenge lies in the media and invasions of privacy. But for some reason people hate them for it.
It would be a fitting end to the monarchy as by then he would probably be the last King/Queen.
It doesn't really make him guilty either, he may or may not have slept with this 17 year old and even if he did it may have been consensual.
Means nothing.
Everyone knows you never talk to the cops. You get an attorney and he will tell you to do nothing.
So please stop all this.
Because they're supposed to remain in the stocks while the press and public were free to flog them. That is the only way which will quell the public hate
The investigators in the USA have made it quite clear that Andrew isn't even a suspect. He's offered to speak to them if they come to the UK - which they don't want to do as they will lose leverage and they need as much of that as possible in any interview with such a high profile individual.
They can interview him at any time, in the presence of lawyers, in the UK. But really they need to deal with Ghislaine Maxwell first.
Wait you are telling me.. she has the audacity to both be black and they combine that with standing up for themselves and controlling their own lives?! Disgraceful.
They'd have to wait their turn, I can think of a lot of other people I would rather put in the stocks first
Epstein was convicted and Andrew rushed round to continue hanging out with him, that alone means he is guilty of nonse abetting.
Man of Honour
- Joined
- 29 Mar 2003
- Posts
- 57,658
- Location
- Stoke on Trent
Isn't Andrew's noncing down to the fact he may have had sex with a 17 year old and that 17 year old was in London anyway where having sex with a 17 year old isn't noncing?
I don't know that much about it to be honest.
Noncense.
There’s literally photos of the two of them palling around post conviction...
You know more than me as I dont even know what noncing is ! I harken back for the days when we spoke plain English.
If you hang out with a convicted pedophile willingly, yes, you are guilty of hanging out with a pedophile.
Which isn't an offence in law, therefore there is no 'guilt' as such. Just bad judgement.
This is a new standard for noncing and being a paedophile, words you are happy to describe him as.
The basis of our legal system is innocent until proven guilty and while you and I may have our own opinions of the matter those opinions don't really carry any weight since no wrong doing has been proven in a court of law.