Keeping up with the Markles

The_One said:
Harry is royally knackered when his marriage fails and he has no going running back to buckingham palace
Click to expand...

I expect he'd move back to the UK especially if Charles were King by then. Right totally knackered if his relationship with his father and his brother has broken down irrevocably though.
 
CaptainRAVE said:
One brief overheard comment - quite a leap to thinking that’s why Archie wasn’t made a Prince. I won’t name the person, it would be hugely damaging - so I’ll just screw the whole family instead of naming the one person.
Click to expand...

I'm betting it was Phillip she won't name.
 
thenewoc said:
Living on British soil and doing public engagements, being at certain engagements that foreign diplomats attend etc. Less so when they have a full time job such as army service or helicopter rescue pilot. Whilst they were here they were contributing, giving something back to society in return for their position, privilege, security etc.
Click to expand...

Okay explain why princess Eugenie lives in Kensington palace.

What job does she do to get such privileges and security paid for, etc?
 
Acrotomophilia said:
Says who the Daily Fail, Piers Morgan?:D
Click to expand...

There are people who document pretty much everything the Royals do.

Her complaining about losing their security was also rubbish. They don't get it unless they are working Royals (they no longer are). It's paid for by the UK tax payer. Same with the title for the kid.

She seems to have a bit of a reputation as being a bit of an ****. Even before she social climbed to royalty.
 
Last edited:
Psycho Sonny said:
Okay explain why princess Eugenie lives in Kensington palace.

What job does she do to get such privileges and security paid for, etc?
Click to expand...

I don't know, i'm not an expert on what they do but I'd guess that they share some security aspects due to being here and living in amongst other royals.
 
Dirk Diggler said:
Why do they need to "stay out of the limelight"? Genuine question, if they want to have a public life of their own then why shouldn't they?
Click to expand...
They don't have to. It's their choice. They can do what they like. But if they stay in the limelight they will be hounded by the media.
 
Acrotomophilia said:
Other than the queen can you say 100% other members of the Royal family have followed strict protocol? Because I genuinely doubt certain members of that family have.
Click to expand...

When it comes to the title prince or princess, the rules and protocol are clear, Harry's kids would never have been entitled unless Charles was on the throne.

With regard to the description of the second wedding, if the description is accurate, it wasn't legal. Insufficient witnesses and incorrect setting.

One of the key things to building a credible narrative is not to contradict easily verifiable facts. It undermines the rest of the narrative even if it's largely true.
 
Like butter wouldn't melt...

Shame his mother isn't still alive to better steer him, this is royally ****ed up.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom