Keeping up with the Markles

Yeah there is centuries of discrimination of people because of their eye and hair colour. Man those were terrible times :rolleyes:

The ignorance of some people is astounding it really is.

Asking the question isn't racist. It's only being projected as such by those of colour pushing an agenda.
 
I managed about 45 minutes (excluding adverts) before I had to turn it off. She was spouting so much garbage that I struggled to work out what could or couldn't be true. I wonder if the BBC will put their fact checking team on it because a lot of what she claimed should be relatively easy to verify as true or false.
 
I managed about 45 minutes (excluding adverts) before I had to turn it off. She was spouting so much garbage that I struggled to work out what could or couldn't be true. I wonder if the BBC will put their fact checking team on it because a lot of what she claimed should be relatively easy to verify as true or false.
If you couldn’t work out what was and wasn’t true how do you conclude she was spouting “garbage”?
 
According to my wife, who is neither Royalist nor Republican, but studies the history of England’s Kings and Queens, King George V laid down the rules in 1917.
The titles of Prince and Princess are restricted to the children of the reigning sovereign, e.g. Prince Charles, the children of the sovereign’s sons, e.g. Prince Harry, and the eldest son of the sovereign’s son, e.g. Prince George..



She made it patently clear in the first five seconds, that no one was being paid for the interview, whether she had her fingers crossed when she said it, I didn’t notice.



It was said twice that it was neither the Queen, nor the Duke of Edinburgh, but let’s be fair, they can keep the speculation going for ever just by saying that they’ll never divulge the name.

I didn't say she didn't state that to Meghan. It was a factual observation that she worded it rather loosely in that it was only addressed to Meghan. I didn't claim they were being paid, only there was clearly wiggly room for the possibility.
 
Having concerns about the babys colour is racist

Asking a question isn't a concern. Again that is twisting something innocent into something sinister.

She's that far up her own back side I'm surprised they didn't go for a designer baby where they could have quoted the exact RAL shade.
 
Just turned on Piers Morgan interviewing Meghan Markle's Dad. She hasn't seen him in years, he's never met Harry or Archie. They now live 70 miles away from each other. Yet in the interview Harry was annoyed that Charles hadn't been returning his calls, yet neither of them will see Meghan's dad.

What a pair of hypocrites they are. This is why no-one can take last night's interview seriously. They get to dish it out and play the victim with no rebuttal to the claims they make.

When you fall out with your Dad, fall out with your siblings, fall out with your best friends, fall out with the monarchy. Perhaps the problem is you and not everyone else.
 
I managed about 45 minutes (excluding adverts) before I had to turn it off. She was spouting so much garbage that I struggled to work out what could or couldn't be true. I wonder if the BBC will put their fact checking team on it because a lot of what she claimed should be relatively easy to verify as true or false.

I've not watched it but it is both hilarious and tragic that this is even taking place. The woman is clearly a toxic waste of skin and bones, if society just wrote her off and threw her in the bin she'd soon be forgotten, but no, we must put her all over the papers and news for that sweet sweet cheddar. Put aside the fact that she was married to a royal and she's still just another plastic Hollywood product. Stop giving her airtime and start concentrating on things that actually matter :confused:
 
They literally used the word concern.

There's no proof of what, if anything was said, only their self perpetuated media hype of an interview.

The other thing is any such question to Harry could have a much wider range of responses compared to the average Joe. After all Harry chose to wear a Nazi outfit without assuming it would cause offense so is it credible that a question about their unborn child would cause him offence? His and their responses to any number of questions are likely to be much broader than most which makes such questions more likely.
 

In Harry's recital but that could be them putting their spin on it since we don't have any proof of what was said. They both looked very uncomfortable being questioned about it to me. If they were sure of it being racist and the associated offense they claim, why this long to make such claims and so vague about it.
 
Back
Top Bottom