Kevin Webster not a paedo

estebanrey · 10 Sep 2013 at 15:29

Michael Le Vell Cleared of all charges....

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-24032449

So, do you reckon he'll be back on Corrie soon? Also, will the girl now face contempt of court charges given the not guilty verdict means by definition they thought she was making false claims against him?

estebanrey · 10 Sep 2013 at 20:17

You have to remember Burnsy is a copper. The basic mentality therefore is everyone we arrest is guilty and anyone that is subsequently found 'Not Guilty' must have just had a good lawyer.

In his mind, the police don't make mistakes, only juries do.

estebanrey · 10 Sep 2013 at 20:23

The media butthurt reaction begins....

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/michael-le-vell-might-been-2264465

They printed all kind of crap about the guy and now he's been found innocent despite their coverage they are stopping to criticising the fit of his suit. How about just apologising to him?

estebanrey · 10 Sep 2013 at 20:50

ozaudio said:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F6hRMB57P2U

LOL but be careful, I've been suspended on more than one occasion for linking to a video with a naughty word in.

This is a 'family friendly' forum......unless you are posting soft core porn in the form of a animated image in the 'Awesome GIFs in here please! (Data Heavy)' thread of course in which case you are fine.

estebanrey · 11 Sep 2013 at 15:10

sven256 said:
Plausibility i would guess.

As you are hardly likely to see her accuse brad pitt are you, and claim he flew over every few weeks to abuse her. Le Vell was probably a local man to her, and well know around the area. So a easy target and believable at the same time.

I would suggest the girl (and more crucially her mother) were known to Le Vell. If there wasn't a known relationship between him and the girl and her family it would never have got to court given he supposedly systematically abused her from the age of 9 to 16. I don't think just living in the same area as her would suffice.

So, if she was in Le Vell's circle of friends it is feasible that the mother saw the media scandals going on with other celebrities and saw an opportunity. Probably convinced her materialistic 17 year old daughter they could get a few quid by blackmailing him but he refused to bite. So to prove they were serious, they took it to the police claiming to Le Vell they'd drop the charges if he paid up, which he didn't and by then it was too late to pull out of the 'plan'.

Pure speculation granted, but I'm not saying what I think happened but rather offering a possible answer to the "why would she do it if he was innocent" question.