Hi Folks
I've bought the kids a couple of laptops.
One, is an ASUS TUF Gaming FX707VI. 17.3 Inch 1080p Spec is
i7-13620H, Nvidia 4070, and then I've upgraded the RAM to 32GB DDR5 RAM (2x16GB), and Storage to also have a Samsung 990 Evo Plus 2TB Evo M2 alongside the factory 1TB M2.
The other, is a HP Victus 15-fa1007na 15 Inch 1080p, Spec is
i5-12500H, Nvidia 4050, and then again, I've upgraded the RAM to 32GB DDR4 RAM (2x16GB), and Storage is now a single Samsung 990 Evo Plus 2TB Evo.
Before I say this - they both work great. They do exactly what I wanted them to do.
I decided for lulz I'd quickly run Timespy on them both to see what the performance was like.
ASUS:

HP:

What has surprised me, is the CPUs aren't pinned at max frequency for the run. The HP seems to have coped much better, but the ASUS is all over the place.
They were both plugged into mains with 'best performance' power plan enabled.
Is there a setting somewhere for them to push harder, or is this the joy of mobile gaming.
I've bought the kids a couple of laptops.
One, is an ASUS TUF Gaming FX707VI. 17.3 Inch 1080p Spec is
i7-13620H, Nvidia 4070, and then I've upgraded the RAM to 32GB DDR5 RAM (2x16GB), and Storage to also have a Samsung 990 Evo Plus 2TB Evo M2 alongside the factory 1TB M2.
The other, is a HP Victus 15-fa1007na 15 Inch 1080p, Spec is
i5-12500H, Nvidia 4050, and then again, I've upgraded the RAM to 32GB DDR4 RAM (2x16GB), and Storage is now a single Samsung 990 Evo Plus 2TB Evo.
Before I say this - they both work great. They do exactly what I wanted them to do.
I decided for lulz I'd quickly run Timespy on them both to see what the performance was like.
ASUS:

HP:

What has surprised me, is the CPUs aren't pinned at max frequency for the run. The HP seems to have coped much better, but the ASUS is all over the place.
They were both plugged into mains with 'best performance' power plan enabled.
Is there a setting somewhere for them to push harder, or is this the joy of mobile gaming.