Laptop - Sempron 3100+ Vs Cel-M 380 1.6GHz

[siclilmonkey]

as the title sais

whats gona give me better proformance

(same spec laptop)

Sempron 3100+

Vs

Celeron-M 380 1.6GHz

for the laptop im gona buy

ta

 

[Defcon5]

i dont have any evidence to back this up but id say the sempron without a doubt

 

[m3csl2004]

i dont have any evidence to back this up but id say the sempron without a doubt

why?


celeron

 

[Defcon5]

Just from previous posts from people. but then again its pro amd round these neck of the woods.

 

[ajgoodfellow]

Go for the Celeron

It's the Celeron M which is based on the Pentium M but with half the cache. It's still a fast CPU

If it was against a Celeron D, then the Sempron without a doubt, but against the Celeron M then the Celeron is quicker

The Celeron M has 1.6GHz and 1MB cache, the Sempron has 1.8GHz but only 256KB cache. The Celeron M is also quicker clock for clock than the Sempron

 

[m3csl2004]

Go for the Celeron

It's the Celeron M which is based on the Pentium M but with half the cache. It's still a fast CPU

If it was against a Celeron D, then the Sempron without a doubt, but against the Celeron M then the Celeron is quicker

The Celeron M has 1.6GHz and 1MB cache, the Sempron has 1.8GHz but only 256KB cache. The Celeron M is also quicker clock for clock than the Sempron

exactly - also its a true mobile cpu so should see better bettery life

 

[ajgoodfellow]

Not necessarily as the Celeron M doesn't have speedstep so battery life isn't all that good

 

[siclilmonkey]

chears

gona buy the celeron m one soon thanks