• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Latest benchmarks for 480/1060

hornetstinger

hornetstinger

hornetstinger

Soldato
Joined
6 Sep 2016
Posts
13,307
From a couple of reviews, it seems the 1060 beats the 480. But those benchmarks are from a few months ago, has anyone got latest benchmarks with latest drivers & game patches?

So far it seems the 1060 beats the 480 by about 10% in DX11
 
hornetstinger said:
From a couple of reviews, it seems the 1060 beats the 480. But those benchmarks are from a few months ago, has anyone got latest benchmarks with latest drivers & game patches?

So far it seems the 1060 beats the 480 by about 10% in DX11
Click to expand...

Here is a recent one using the 16.10.1 drivers. The difference is not that much

www.gamersnexus.net/hwreviews/2658-gtx-1050-ti-and-1050-review-benchmarks-vs-460-more/page-4


Also note that the 1060 on the above, is pretty much well overclocked, compared to the 480 which is not.
 
Panos said:
Here is a recent one using the 16.10.1 drivers. The difference is not that much

www.gamersnexus.net/hwreviews/2658-gtx-1050-ti-and-1050-review-benchmarks-vs-460-more/page-4


Also note that the 1060 on the above, is pretty much well overclocked, compared to the 480 which is not.
Click to expand...

I would suggest the 1060 isn't over locked at all. It appears between 1700-1800 whereas a clocked one will go as far as 2150. It's still ahead of the 480 though. I did think the 480 was catching up but those benches show a difference that would only be extended once a decent overclock is added.
 
Brazo said:
I would suggest the 1060 isn't over locked at all. It appears between 1700-1800 whereas a clocked one will go as far as 2150. It's still ahead of the 480 though. I did think the 480 was catching up but those benches show a difference that would only be extended once a decent overclock is added.
Click to expand...
There are no actual clock speeds for the Nvidia cards listed. It's just the boost clock from the spec sheet. Every Nvidia card I've personally owned has boosted way beyond its rated minimum boost clock. The 980 Ti Classified I bought recently has a rated boost clock of 1291MHz for instance, yet it actually boosts to 1442MHz without touching anything. Pascal's GPU Boost 3.0 is generally more aggressive than 2.0 as well.

You can argue one way or the other about whether GPU Boost counts as "overclocking" as such, but it certainly does drive up performance right out of the box, whereas AMD cards have a rigid clock speed that will never be exceeded.
 
hornetstinger said:
From a couple of reviews, it seems the 1060 beats the 480. But those benchmarks are from a few months ago, has anyone got latest benchmarks with latest drivers & game patches?

So far it seems the 1060 beats the 480 by about 10% in DX11
Click to expand...

got it backwards.
480 for half the price and change vs a 1070 its within 14fps.
so gameplay wise which card will grow faster along the way and we know the answer.

http://www.guru3d.com/index.php?ct=articles&action=file&id=26611

480 is the best card this generation for any gamer at 1080p
 
.
Klo said:
I think the 480 is starting to beat it in some DX12 games.
Click to expand...

AMD cards in general are performing extremely well in new games, look at CoD IW benchmarks and Titanfall2 benchmarks, be prepared for a lot of "those games are rubbish" etc from a lot of people.

Currently AMD cards are performing really well, the 480 is 13fps ahead of the 1060 on Guru3D bench of CoD IW and even ahead of a 390.

http://www.guru3d.com/articles_page...e_warfare_pc_graphics_benchmark_review,6.html

https://www.computerbase.de/2016-11...abschnitt_benchmarks_von_full_hd_bis_ultra_hd

Titanfall2
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=t...=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8#imgrc=dzo-9elsR_zmXM:

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/www.te...all-2-pc-benchmarks/?client=ms-android-google

https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=t...=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8#imgrc=apwCinY__gLhKM:

Just a quick Google returned that lot
 
Last edited:
SiDeards73 said:
.

AMD cards in general are performing extremely well in new games, look at CoD IW benchmarks and Titanfall2 benchmarks, be prepared for a lot of "those games are rubbish" etc from a lot of people.

Currently AMD cards are performing really well, the 480 is 13fps ahead of the 1060 on Guru3D bench of CoD IW and even ahead of a 390.

http://www.guru3d.com/articles_page...e_warfare_pc_graphics_benchmark_review,6.html

https://www.computerbase.de/2016-11...abschnitt_benchmarks_von_full_hd_bis_ultra_hd

Titanfall2
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=t...=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8#imgrc=dzo-9elsR_zmXM:

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/www.te...all-2-pc-benchmarks/?client=ms-android-google
Click to expand...

Looking at those Guru3D figures I would say that CoD IW has a CPU bottleneck problem @1080p which is skewing the figures. A GTX 1080 and Pascal Titan for example should not score exactly the same unless there is a problem with the test setup.

Having said that the RX480 is a very good card.:)
 
Klo said:
I think the 480 is starting to beat it in some DX12 games.
Click to expand...

It is but where those games also offer dx11 the 1060 is still the faster card overall.

Where they are dx12 only well you can count them on one hand and find them in the bargain bin.
 
Brazo said:
It is but where those games also offer dx11 the 1060 is still the faster card overall.

Where they are dx12 only well you can count them on one hand and find them in the bargain bin.
Click to expand...

Please see the above benchmarks i posted for CoD:IW and Titanfall2, most sites have the 480 faster than the 1060 in DX11 in those 2 titles.

Yes its only 2 games, yes those games are probably terrible and probably are running on rubbish engines or whatever, the 480 is still faster... in DX11.

Those 2 titles will sell bucketloads also, one because it has Call of Duty written all over it and the other because some crazy people actually liked Titanfall.
 
SiDeards73 said:
Please see the above benchmarks i posted for CoD:IW and Titanfall2, most sites have the 480 faster than the 1060 in DX11 in those 2 titles.

Yes its only 2 games, yes those games are probably terrible and probably are running on rubbish engines or whatever, the 480 is still faster... in DX11.

Those 2 titles will sell bucketloads also, one because it has Call of Duty written all over it and the other because some crazy people actually liked Titanfall.
Click to expand...

Given the bench you posted is the exception to the rule and given there seems to be a bug or something as the titan matches the 1080 I'll wait for some more benches first.
 
Brazo said:
Given the bench you posted is the exception to the rule and given there seems to be a bug or something as the titan matches the 1080 I'll wait for some more benches first.
Click to expand...

Some pretty serious bottle necking going on there at 1080p in that Guru graph. 480 is as fast as a Fury X for example.
 
Well, my 480 definitely runs most DX11 games better than my 970 did. The peak FPS might not be much different, but it feels smoother and more consistent. DX12 runs WAY better, no contest there.
 
Last edited:
Kaapstad said:
Looking at those Guru3D figures I would say that CoD IW has a CPU bottleneck problem @1080p which is skewing the figures. A GTX 1080 and Pascal Titan for example should not score exactly the same unless there is a problem with the test setup.

Having said that the RX480 is a very good card.:)
Click to expand...
The games capped at 125.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom