Laws on naked pictures of girls?

FrostedNipple · 27 Apr 2009 at 14:26

Now I'm no peadofile, but i always assumed because you have to be 18 to watch nakedness, the nakedees also need to be 18, however Tamsin Egerton got her **** out in the film 'Keeping Mum' and she was only 16. So what is the law?

non nude pic to make this thread worthwhile. for nude just google.
http://bitcast-a.v1.lhr1.bitgravity...mages/9/96/WENN-wennphotos-899903_405_794.jpg

FrostedNipple · 27 Apr 2009 at 14:33

nikebee said:
So you can take pictures and have videos of 9,10,11 year old kids nude... if it's considered "art" and not pornographic?

Doesn't sound right to me.

you sure about 9,10,11? That doesn't seem right to me! Artistic or not it's fap material for wierdos.

FrostedNipple · 27 Apr 2009 at 14:42

nikebee said:
I missread arknor's post. I thought he was intending that it's fine at any age as long as its not pornographic. I missed the "16+" part.

ahh right lol. But in the film she had her **** out because she was (in the script) having sex in a van. How is that artistic lol?

FrostedNipple · 27 Apr 2009 at 14:57

Daniel said:
Over 18 to be in adult movies...16 with parents consent if it's for a film and is considered as art and not pornography.

i thought the porn industry produced films?

FrostedNipple · 27 Apr 2009 at 15:12

Not sure about 15, but there are definitely age 16 states, and also some states require you to be 21 to watch porn.

FrostedNipple · 27 Apr 2009 at 15:26

nikebee said:
100% correct... seen that on enough sites to know thats true

yup haha

FrostedNipple · 27 Apr 2009 at 15:27

wannabedamned said:
There are naturism communities where the whole families spend time naked, with other families and friends. All ages.

So how would it work if they were photographing the event, are they then breaking the law?

I don't think it is right for parents to force their own beliefs onto CHILDREN, and i also assume it to be illegal. Under 16 it would probably not be classed as their own decision.

FrostedNipple · 27 Apr 2009 at 15:33

RDM said:
Don't you mean "I don't think it is right for parents to force beliefs I don't agree with onto children".

Nope. I'm an athiest, but i wouldn't force that on children either. In an ideal world you would expose them to as much as possible. Which i think i got through school, you learn about different cultures.

FrostedNipple · 27 Apr 2009 at 15:37

Amp34 said:
But you believe it is fine for society to force it's beliefs on CHILDREN? Remember being naked is natural, it is only society that makes us think that nudity is bad. If you grow up at ease with your body because your parents took you to a naturist community then what is the problem?

Our society wears clothes because its so cold all the time. Plenty of people get their bodies out in the summer. And i certainly don't think our society is offended by porn any more. But walking round naked all the time is like going to the dessert and wearing 3 layers all the time. Not to mention the wasted energy due to the extra heating they need.

FrostedNipple · 27 Apr 2009 at 15:42

Amp34 said:
So what is the problem with parent taking their children to a naturist beach for example? Society as a whole still frowns on nudity.

And actually walking around completely naked in a town center is technically legal, as long as you are not causing distress.

A naked beach will make children cry, it really is a ghastly sight.

FrostedNipple · 27 Apr 2009 at 15:45

wannabedamned said:
No no no, Seeing me naked would cause only admiration

admiration? More like curiosity.