Oh What to do....I currently have a Canon 70-200L 2.8 IS Mk2 plus a Tamrom 17-50 f2.8. I generally use the Canon when out and about (hard work lugging it around) and then use the Tamron when indoors. However I am considering selling both these lenses and then going for the following setup:
Canon 50mm 1.4
Canon 100-400 4.5-5.6L IS USM
Canon 100mm 2.8L Macro
I am looking at this setup for the purpose of family photos indoors, family photos outdoor especially of MY kids in the park/beach/etc and then the MACRO to just start into the field of things. Also the 100-400 could open up more sports and wildlife choices for me.
I am wondering about the loss of the 70-200 for outdoors as it is great IQ and what sort of IQ would the 100-400 give compared to the 20-700. I know the 50mm will improve the IQ over the Tamron.
Just looking for your thoughts and opinions on this move. Camera is a 60d by the way.
Canon 50mm 1.4
Canon 100-400 4.5-5.6L IS USM
Canon 100mm 2.8L Macro
I am looking at this setup for the purpose of family photos indoors, family photos outdoor especially of MY kids in the park/beach/etc and then the MACRO to just start into the field of things. Also the 100-400 could open up more sports and wildlife choices for me.
I am wondering about the loss of the 70-200 for outdoors as it is great IQ and what sort of IQ would the 100-400 give compared to the 20-700. I know the 50mm will improve the IQ over the Tamron.
Just looking for your thoughts and opinions on this move. Camera is a 60d by the way.
Last edited: