lol i fail to see how anyone can stick up for this guy
in my view he either :
a) knew the pc's had pirate software on them and was getting them on the cheap , possibly charging the school full price and pocketing the excess ?
b) knew the software was pirated but hoped to save the school some money ie condoning theft . hardly an ideal subject to be taught in school
c) thought the software was legitimate in which case he should disclose the source of the pc's and show all the receipts in which case i would assume he would be in the clear .
if i have to pay for my OS why the hell shouldn't russian schoolkids or anyone else for that matter ?
if you dont like the price of windows then run linux instead !
in my view he either :
a) knew the pc's had pirate software on them and was getting them on the cheap , possibly charging the school full price and pocketing the excess ?
b) knew the software was pirated but hoped to save the school some money ie condoning theft . hardly an ideal subject to be taught in school
c) thought the software was legitimate in which case he should disclose the source of the pc's and show all the receipts in which case i would assume he would be in the clear .
if i have to pay for my OS why the hell shouldn't russian schoolkids or anyone else for that matter ?
if you dont like the price of windows then run linux instead !