lightroom 3.2 save as tiff

right got it sorted.


yes they only want jpeg files.

the 24mb limit is reference to the tiff file that you save the jpeg from.

so I'll edit in LR save as a tiff (uncompressed) then save as jpeg in the highest quality setting from the tiff file.

Job done. /off to upload some images :)


I don't think you need to save as TIFF first.
They want an 8MP photo in RGB 8bit. This equates to 24MB when uncompressed. TIFF is an uncompressed format. Therefore, if your photo saved as a TIFF and is 24MB then it has enough resolution.

There is no difference going RAW->TIFF->JPG than RAW-JPG.

Just use the highest possible JPEG quality, least compression.
 
pretty much yeah. they want to see 4 images which they check at 100%. if all 4 are good then you are accepted.

If they reject 2 for reasons that you can't fix, then you aren't going to be able to use those 2 on alamy.

I had all 4 rejected as two of the them where 'soft or lacks definition'. So I've chosen two others from my collection and with the two they had nothing bad to say against I uploaded all 4 again.

Thats right. Getting 2 photos accepted is already a good start.
Well done.
 
I would love to see images that passed and failed.

TBH, I have been too scared to submit to Alamy and have put stock photography on the back burn while I fiish my PhD
 
images currently waiting for QC...

I haven't got a pro account on either photobucket or flikr so can't do full res

These first 3 have already passed.

1,
thoughtfulchild.jpg


2,
seaside.jpg


3,
Boatondrydock.jpg


This one is the newer one I added to the collection.

4,
toponder.jpg


This one was one that failed. - Too much noise apperently!! Which is a shame as I love this image. :)

5,
_MG_0271.jpg
 
Thanks for your thread, it motivated me to submit and see if I pass the test, which I did with my first 4 images.

I used some recently uploaded photos from http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?t=18182025&highlight=pika
The pika and squirrel in photos 4 and 6.

To this I added a photo of a wild chamois/mountain goat. (which was razor sharp).
I added variety with a landscape shot of lake Louise, nothing special, typical tourist photo 2 minutes from the car park but I had good lighting at 7am.

It is a pity most of my stock portfolio which has all been well processed and key-worded with IPTC are taken on my old 6Mp so aren't natively of high enough resolution. My best quality and best selling few dozen I might interpolate once I have read ALamy's instructions.


But now it is the tricky stage, waiting for sales. It will be interesting to follow as most of my previous stock work did not involve nature photography and if I get even a few sales of nature shots on Alamy then I will be happy.

I hope you get accepted soon. Although I have no idea what the reviewers are looking for, I think having fairly standard photos of high technical quality helps. What I mean is that they may not be looking for highly processed images, at least for the initial test.Stock photography is not the same as art sales, and this is important for technical reasons as well as aesthetic. Things like sharpening should be done at the last stage of production, therefore submitted photos should not already be sharpened, leave that to the graphic designers.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom