Little advise please

Gammawolf · 28 Jun 2009 at 14:41

Was wondering if someone could give me a detailed analysis on these, and should i ignore the fact core temp and real temp are showing diffrent speeds to cpu-z? also was wondering how far an e6300 will go vcore wise?

Ben M · 28 Jun 2009 at 16:58

That processor had me scratching my head for a moment there, I forgot that they released a new 45nm E6300.

To answer your question about voltage, people say not to put more than 1.4-1.45V vcore through these chips, as beyond that they suffer from degrading clocks over time. So you've got a bit of room there.

As for temperatures, realtemp is the one which you want to trust.

BigBruiserAl · 28 Jun 2009 at 17:16

Ben M said:
That processor had me scratching my head for a moment there, I forgot that they released a new 45nm E6300.

To answer your question about voltage, people say not to put more than 1.4-1.45V vcore through these chips, as beyond that they suffer from degrading clocks over time. So you've got a bit of room there.

As for temperatures, realtemp is the one which you want to trust.

hes on about speeds not temp theres only 1c in between the two. it prob a bug mate as long as the maths add up in the bios nothing to worry about

Ben M · 28 Jun 2009 at 18:32

BigBruiserAl said:
hes on about speeds not temp theres only 1c in between the two. it prob a bug mate as long as the maths add up in the bios nothing to worry about

Oh right, so it is. Sorry, I was in standard answer mode for a bit there.

I'd go with whichever clockspeed agrees with what you have set in the bios in that case.