Loneliness Has Escalated Into A Social Epidemic

Permabanned
Joined
2 Sep 2017
Posts
10,490
:eek: :confused: Loneliness In Britain Has Escalated From Personal Misfortune Into A Social Epidemic

Imagine Britain in the grip of a chronic illness that was causing widespread misery, costing the country millions in lost days at work, and doing more harm to those affected than smoking fifteen cigarettes a day or being obese. There would be calls for immediate action.

That is exactly the impact that loneliness is having. The evidence suggests that loneliness increases the risk of premature death by about a third, as the NHS will be highlighting later this week. But because it is so often hidden from sight, it is too easy to ignore. The damage it is doing right now is so profound that we have to respond quickly. Fortunately, the cost of effective action is not high. The price of inaction is enormous.

We have been studying the evidence over the past year as co-chairs of the Jo Cox Loneliness Commission. It is now clear that none of us is immune. As Jo herself said, “young or old, loneliness doesn’t discriminate.”

For some, its phases are acute but fleeting. For others, chronic and debilitating. The triggers can be anything from losing a loved one, to major changes at work or in our home lives. Loneliness surrounds us, from the quiet child in class to the high-powered executive too busy to engage in meaningful conversation, from the new mum to the family carer. It hides in plain sight.

We have been here before. For a long time, we saw positive mental health as the norm and mental illness as an aberration. It turned out that wasn’t true. The same applies to loneliness.

For individuals, loneliness can be hugely draining emotionally. There’s a reason why misbehaving toddlers are sent alone to the ‘naughty corner’ and why solitary confinement is used on prisoners as a punishment and torture technique.

Mentally, loneliness results in anxiety and stress, insomnia and depression, dementia and neurodegenerative disease. Physically, it can lead to high blood pressure, cardiovascular disease, strokes, and diabetes. Lonely people visit GPs more often, stay longer when in hospital and find it harder to recover afterwards.

As families, loneliness can rob us of perspective and cause our closest bonds – our safety nets – to fray.

It undermines community cohesion as people disengage, forgetting that we have more in common than that which divides us, receding into their respective corners in a downwards spiral of withdrawal.

And it damages our national economy, to the tune of £32bn per annum.

The evidence is clear: loneliness is toxic. And the problem is getting worse by the day.

We are living alone more, often moving away from family, and we work alone at home more too. We spend a greater proportion of our day by ourselves than we did ten years ago. Many of the institutions that once brought us together are fading, as each week another church or pub is converted into flats. On-line ‘friends’ replace real ones. The professionals, whether GPs, carers or church leaders, tell us they now have to confront the damage done by loneliness on a daily basis.

We can’t leave it up to them. All of us need to make tackling loneliness our business. Starting a conversation each day in your neighbourhood can be a radical act of community service. Whether it be in the doctor’s waiting room or the supermarket queue, it really is good to talk. We walk the same streets, so let’s not live in different worlds.

We learn from National Rail, on whose tracks hundreds of desperate people commit suicide every year, that just saying hello or asking someone on the platform about the weather could avert another tragic death.

So, let’s try to break out of the routine journey that is head-down, headphones-in, not a word spoken from home to work, and have a quick chat with a fellow passenger. When we get home, let’s phone an older relative or check on a neighbour who may be lonely but too proud or embarrassed to say so.

On Friday we will be publishing the report of the Jo Cox Loneliness Commission.

Central to our recommendations is the need for ministers to make tackling loneliness a priority at all levels of government. Yes, it will cost some money but, like all preventive interventions, will save far more in the long run.

We can’t afford not to act. Loneliness in Britain has escalated from personal misfortune into a social epidemic.

It doesn’t have to be this way. The problem is solvable. If we were all to play our part in strengthening the increasingly thin ties between us we could build a less lonely Britain.

As MPs, working to continue Jo’s work on this has been the greatest privilege of our professional lives. She pictured a country where nobody need feel isolated from the rest of society unless they choose to. Now it’s down to the rest of us to make that vision a reality.

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/health/mi...ocial-epidemic/ar-BBGu44c?ocid=ob-fb-engb-667

In continuation of the previous thread: https://forums.overclockers.co.uk/t...-you-as-smoking-15-cigarettes-a-day.18169063/

In the end of the day, it looks like social media and personal computers don't help, actually they do enough harm to the population, too. :eek: :confused:
 
I can relate to this.

Naturally I am extremely anti social and choose my circle of who I acquaint with very very selectively.

This isnt because I am a social snob who believes he is better than anyone else.


However, when I tell people (who dont know me) that I am like this, they are genuinely shocked. The nature of my business is networking, relationship building and large scale presentations and seminars, and I am pretty good at it. I have this ability to turn on the charisma when required despite the fact that its the total antithesis of what I am about.

Online shopping and self service for the win!

Well, there isn't a reason for this. Imagine how many wonderful people you skip because of misjudgement. You can't know a person well at first glance or first talk.

Many people are good, they have good family relationships (with parents, brothers, sisters, cousins, etc) and a narrow friends circle but the problem is that they can't make this circle larger. In this way, the society is divided into countless small groups which are otherwise well inside but may be quite hostile outside.
 
Better than staying with internet, go outside and enjoy our wonderful Planet in person. There are so many dozens of beautiful cities and places in nature which are worth visiting. Much better than staying at home and staring at a stupid screen.
 
This is a very narrow view of what is right.

Some people are just natural introverts. That doesn't mean they don't socialise personally or professionally, just that it is something that takes energy rather than gives energy.

It's what I've found hardest about having a child and moving in with my partner, I no longer get a couple of hours at night or a weekend where I can just switch off from the "pressure" of having to socialise.

The difference between online and offline is that online you can respond or interact in your own time, or not at all if that's how you feel, not something that you can do in a social face to face situation.

It is not narrow. It is just absolutely true.

You don't have the energy to share for the better of the surrounding world. Even if someone is looking for your help.
That's bad and that's exactly what quite enough people do.

I have the energy and enthusiasm to work for the common wealth. Do you have the willngness to change or do you think that the world is fine as it is?
It is not!
 
You're still not getting what being an introvert means, it doesn't mean you cut off from the world or don't enjoy going out and socialising.

It just means it's harder work. You could liken it to a physical hobby you enjoy, it's fun but physically tires you, being an introvert means you can enjoy being sociable but find it mentally tiring.

The stuff about working for the greater good is just waffle.

It isn't a waffle. Do you have an idea how many billions in this world are treated badly because no one pays attention to help them in the proper way and to give them the same as some another billion or so people get? Because some have better politicians to rule them and others have politicians-idiots with the completely wrong priorities and aroggance to the heavens?

An introvert is a person (from what I have read) who likes to turn to themselves and enjoys to stay with themselves mostly and to work with the others to a much limited extent.
Introverts usually say to the others to be like them - to enjoy loneliness to some (or full) extent.
They justify this by saying that most of the time people spend with themselves.
Which is a very ugly behaviour.

I also get tired physically and mentally all the time. But that doesn't mean that I should give up and turn to myself. How will I contribute if I am passive and not mostly active?
 
I think some here have mistaken being alone for loneliness. Speaking for myself, I've spent hours feeling lonely in the pub surrounded by people and hours feeling happily connected to others while alone at home.

I think that social media and technology has allowed us all to present a very edited version of our lives online, where we only look happy, surrounded by people, and are celebrating. It's easy to assume, when that's all you see, that others don't feel sad, lonely etc and thus that we are failures or missing out because our lives aren't like those heavily edited version of our friends lives. I also think that the ability to communicate 'en mass' possibly also degrades the quality of our interactions. Prior to Facebook I might have phoned my friends to say I was getting married, for example, individually. This might have lead to lengthy and meaningful conversations about our respective fears of mucking up on the day or whatever. When my friends post such stuff on Facebook its greeted with 50 likes and comments saying 'congratulations'. Hardly a quality and meaningful interaction.

I think, in this age of instantaneous public communication, we all need to make an effort to engage with someone, or a group of trusted someone's, in a meaningful quality way but its substance of that interaction, not the means which matters in my mind.


I blame facebook

Social media or marketing.... But I notice that many people while sharing how happy they are around some friends and relatives, they do not present themselves in the best possible light with sharing quotes (sometimes of very famous people) which are wrong.
 
So many people are the embodiment of life on facebook, It seems every time you see a post they are doing something amazing, with someone amazing and are amazingly happy. But none of that translates into real life a lot of the time. They put everything into putting that view of themselves on social media and forget to actually live life a bit. Everything is about the next instagram picture thats going to get a ton of like or facebook post or whatever, you get my point. I very rarely go on facebook(almost never for other SM) and if i do its for messenger or a few different pages that im liked to and do not understand at all the social media obsession that almost everyone around me (age 22) has.

The only social thing in the capitalist system is the social media.
The capitalists take themselves so seriously that they always claim they are too social, need to be less. If they go even a little bit more in the right direction, they will touch the fascism itself.
 
Back
Top Bottom