Ok heres your starter:
An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind.
Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi
An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind.
Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi
Thanks for the link.
Live as if your were to die tomorrow. Learn as if you were to live forever.
Ooops just realised ive started this thread in the wrong forum can an Admin kindly move it to 'General Discussion', thanks.cleanbluesky said:Welcome and thank you for a refreshing breach of etiquette...
If I had no sense of humor, I would long ago have committed suicide.
He was totally against it. From wikipedia last paragraph. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_caste_systemand proponent of the segretative caste system within his homeland;
He deliberately created the Word Harijan in his day in trying to empower them, however today its deemed to be patronising.The inclusion of lower castes into the mainstream was argued for by Mahatma Gandhi who called them "Harijans" (people of God).
tried hard to bring untouchables into the mainstream of society and get the other castes to discard the practice of untouchability.
I need to research this but could well be true since he spent his early years in SA. His enlightenment years came much later in his life, in fact when he was an old man. He did go through a phase of profound change. He abandoned common cultural dogma and brought about many reforms. Martin Luther King happened to be one of his greatest admirers. Heres a quote from Encarta(last paragraph). http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761557424/Martin_Luther_King.html#p22"Why, of all places in Johannesburg, the Indian location should be chosen for dumping down all kaffirs of the town, passes my comprehension.
Of course, under my suggestion, the Town Council must withdraw the Kaffirs from the Location. About this mixing of the Kaffirs with the Indians I must confess I feel most strongly. I think it is very unfair to the Indian population, and it is an undue tax on even the proverbial patience of my countrymen."
In 1959 King visited India and worked out more clearly his understanding of Gandhi's principle of nonviolent persuasion
Not the only one to get Hitler wrong:Originally Posted by Gandhi
I do not consider Hitler to be as bad as he is depicted. He is showing an ability that is amazing and seems to be gaining his victories without much bloodshed.
Winston Churchill, in his book Great Contemporaries (1937) had declared: "One may dislike Hitler’s system and yet admire his patriotic achievement. If our country were defeated, I hope we should find a champion as admirable to restore our courage and lead us back to our place among the nations."
(When asked if he was a Hindu)Yes I am, I am also a Muslim, a Christian, a Buddhist, and a Jew.
I would far rather that Hinduism died than untouchability lived.
Listen to Einstein here: http://streams.gandhiserve.org/einstein.htmlEinstein on Gandhi: Generations to come will scarcely believe that such a one as this walked the earth in flesh and blood.
" Martin Luther King Jr: Gandhi was inevitable. If humanity is to progress, Gandhi is inescapable. He lived, thought and acted, inspired by the vision of humanity evolving toward a world of peace and harmony. We may ignore Gandhi at our own risk."
cleanbluesky said:Care to share the fascination with Gandhi... are you Indian as well?
Hence I started this thread cause I admire Gandhi. I got wound up by people on this thread labelling him as a racist. Well either the likes of Martin Luther King and Steve Biko were ignorant or forgiving.Originally Posted by Cir108
"kumar101 - Cir108 you will have to start a new thread under General Discussion."
If things are what we merely see/envisage, we won't need that many senses. Start a new thread on any topic under the sun and the words "separate realities" might enlighten.
When there is no speech, there can be no thoughts nor language. Then we perceive in shades of black and white. BPI perhaps.
bam0 said:Wound up? Why? his words and actions are recorded in history, it's not as though anyone has made up anything.
He did some good things, i'm not denying it. He also seemed to be prejudiced and considered the native africans in south africa to be inferior to Indians, and while "championing" the cause of the Dalits worked against them ever attaining any real power or freedom.