Man in court for not paying TV Licence

[zoomee]

Interesting how not a single UK media outlet is covering this:

http://www.globalresearch.ca/histor...rage-of-the-september-11-2001-attacks/5323881

Now before the conspiracy theorists jump aboard, this post isn't to discuss the various theories out there. More so to discuss why when so many valid questions have been posed invalidating the 'official' line of events portrayed to us, that this hasn't seen any media coverage. I'm sure we'd all like to know the truth - especially when we pay for that 'truth'!!

Court case is due to take place tommorow.

 

[zoomee]

So rather than the "BBC in the dock for manipulating evidence of 9/11" the thread title should actually be "Man in court for not paying TV Licence"? Any mod fancy changing the title?

Let me have my fun with a sensationalist headline - My thread title is taken from the webpage directly, so is not 'untrue'

GDI!, you guys are party poopers, there's a news story here somewhere!! (hence why its in ere and not SD )

EDIT: 2 late! - modded

 

[zoomee]

already shot down in flames here mate

http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?t=18491383&highlight=zoomee

The judge ruled that whilst he may have a case against the BBC's coverage that day, it still doesnt warrant why the guy shouldn't pay his TV bill.