McCanns going too far?

Mr-White said:
do they not say if they're not found within 2 weeks they're most likely dead ?
Click to expand...

Actually I think you will find in 'stranger' kidnapping case's if they are not found with 24 Hours of the abduction the chances of finding them alive are minimal :(
 
Last edited:
@if ®afiq said:
Releasing a single??? If you can't see it then no point in saying it.

And WTF has religion got to do with anything???? You really do make some ignorant comments.
Click to expand...

Taste is very much in the eye of the beholder I hope you agree. You've said plenty on here that I and other find distasteful but lets not get into that here.

You're right, I apologise for the muslim comment. I was going to take that out but got distracted.
 
ElRazur said:
Or the guy that looks and dresses like he lives on the street....You know the one that organises live8 or something.
Click to expand...

Thats Sir Bob Geldof to you :p.

As a parent himself, I'm sure he'd agree wholeheartedly with what the McCann's are doing to find Maddy.
 
Kronologic said:
Who said she was abducted?

In this case I think it is clear where to point the finger. If there was a responsible adult minding the 3 children then she would not have gone missing.
Additionally how did the "sicko" get in? why did the "sicko" not take the other 2?

There is more to this than we know about.
Click to expand...

Fair point. It was an assumption, just seemed the most logical to make.

My Mum has said since the beginning the parents are involved in some way. She has said the same about other strange cases like this (mostly strange murders where the husband/wife turned out to be responsible) and has been right a worrying amount of times. I'm with you on this, there does seem to be more than we know. To what extent I'm unsure. I don't think they were involved in her going missing (taking part in the process) but I believe the extent of neglect comes into question.
 
Six6siX said:
Equally so, would she be missing if someone didn't take her?
Click to expand...
She could have wondered off. So yes.

Six6siX said:
Even if they had stayed in, someone could have taken her. Granted, not as likely to happen, but there is still a probability associated.
Click to expand...
And they would have been aware of it much faster/called the police sooner/raised the alarm immediately/ and likely be chasing said perpetrator's

Six6siX said:
Lets say that there is a probability that a certain child will be kidnapped. There is ALWAYS a probability that they could be kidnapped. This probability can increase or decrease based on things which directly relate to the event. Eg...
a) The location of the parents
b) The (potential kidnapper)
c) The time of day
d) The state of mind of the child

and a million other things.
Click to expand...

You missed out age of the child Which imo is a very important factor, At a certain age you do have to release your control and observation of your child a little to allow them some independence. 3 years old however is way too young for that.


Six6siX said:
It just so happened that on the day, a series of events which, by happening in a particular order gave rise to the current situation.
Click to expand...
Yes the parents put their wants before the safety of their children. Their daughter could easily have drowned in the bath, set the place on fire or sustained a head injury whilst not being watched.
Six6siX said:
Therefore, although the parents are responsible, it is no way correct to place the blame entirely on them imo.
Click to expand...
Yes it is. They left 3 children under the age of 4 unattended for a significant time in a foreign country, whilst they went out on a jolly. No one else is to blame for this. Maddy would be alive at home and well for certain if they had not gone out.

Oh and for the record, I don't think she was abducted. I mean surely they would have at least locked the door.
 
sniffy said:
Fair point. It was an assumption, just seemed the most logical to make.

My Mum has said since the beginning the parents are involved in some way. She has said the same about other strange cases like this (mostly strange murders where the husband/wife turned out to be responsible) and has been right a worrying amount of times. I'm with you on this, there does seem to be more than we know. To what extent I'm unsure. I don't think they were involved in her going missing (taking part in the process) but I believe the extent of neglect comes into question.
Click to expand...

They could not put an act on 24/7
 
Kronologic said:
snip
Click to expand...

I do see your point, but if we assume that it turns out she was kidnapped (and let's face it, it's the thing that's most likely to have happened), would you say that the the kidnappers are not in the wrong at all? The blame still lies 100% with the parents?
 
ElRazur said:
McCanns - Are we going overboard with too many threads? Im tired of seeing it popping up n my screen. :mad:
Click to expand...

A good rule of thumb is that if you don't like the title of the thread, you probably won't like what's within it. I recommend you stop clicking threads with 'McCann' in the title :)
 
ElRazur said:
McCanns - Are we going overboard with too many threads? Im tired of seeing it popping up n my screen. :mad:
Click to expand...

Im with you on this one ElRazur, and i got flamed for pointing it out last time as well. I was waiting for somebody to say it just so i could get a laugh at the people flaming 'Omg you dont like eet dont clik eet!' Those people are cool.

Hilarious
 
sniffy said:
A good rule of thumb is that if you don't like the title of the thread, you probably won't like what's within it. I recommend you stop clicking threads with 'McCann' in the title :)
Click to expand...

The problem is that my hand and finger have a mind of its own and would still click regardless. Im not suppose to type this statement but my hands and fingers got the getter of me. ;)
 
Six6siX said:
I do see your point, but if we assume that it turns out she was kidnapped (and let's face it, it's the thing that's most likely to have happened), would you say that the the kidnappers are not in the wrong at all? The blame still lies 100% with the parents?
Click to expand...


As I said if they were there and attentive responsible parents, she would not have been abducted, wandered off or drowned in the bath.

Remember we are talking about a girl that was taken from home (or holiday home) not a child that was taken from a public place.

In a public place parents do have less control. Children are more able to be separated and then taken.

How often do you hear of children being taken from inside their home when the parents are around?
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom