Mhz for Mhz Comparison... 2013 tech v's Modern tech... who can join me?

[pugheaven]

Hi Guys,

EDITED: I originally asked for 4.6ghz and multi cores, however, that makes no sense, but that would mean a lot of people won't be able to post so,

I've amended this to 4.0Ghz which allows the Ryzen crew in as well, so can any posts now be for 4.0Ghz CPU's please. Thanks guys, would really be good to see a mhz per mhz comparison on all the different chips variations... IT DOESN'T MATTER HOW MANY CORES NOW, SIMPLY AS WE NEED TO CONCENTRATE ON THE SINGLE CORE SCORE ANYWAY!

Using CPU-Z just as a benchmark... This is everyone who's contributed as of yet:

CPUZ SCORES @4Ghz (give or take error on bus)
E5 Xeon 1860 V2: Single Core = 411.8 (Pugheaven)
Ryzen7 3700X: Single Core = 481.7 (EdButler)
Ryzen5 2400G: Single Core = 455.8 (sandys)
Ryzen Threadripper 2970x: Single Core = 464.7 (sandys)
Ryzen5 3600: Single Core = 476.6 (Humbug)

The reason I'm interested in this now is the below video I watched which to me was a really interesting article, so rather than play games, would prefer to look at raw power and the easiest way I suppose is a quick benchmark that takes single and multi into consideration and everyone usually has the app... just be interesting to see if we've come anywhere in the last 7-8 years... I believe AMD have but I'm not convinced with Intel...

 

[pugheaven]

@pugheaven here you go: https://valid.x86.fr/58tlfx

As another comparison point, here is my daily. Lots of oc headroom in the newer platform: https://valid.x86.fr/58tlfx

nice speeds... I agree this is my problem in a way though in the fact that INtel seems to throw mhz at things now rather than genuinly increase the IPC and be innovative hence probably why AMD caught them up in a way clock for clock, hence why I wanted to see in that one for example is there any chance you could just do one run at 4600mhz for me mate on all cores just to see what yours comes out with? We know that thwe new platform can do 5.2ghz, but what I wanna see here is a like for like in mhz to just see what improvement of which there will be have been made in the last few years as I'm not convinced other than increasing mhz for Intel... seems like AMD is the only one that's actaully made what I'd call progress... as a lot of i7's ok they were 4 core but could hit 5ghz 8 years ago...

Would really be appreciated if you could as I'd love to see it mate. Cheers P.S Just for interest what's that run temp wise maxed out sday with OCCT or AIDA64 with FPU testing? I believe they run hot by all accounts?

 

[pugheaven]

I think more like 4 Ghz would let you include most recent CPUs in this test

Yeah I ageree thinking about it, 4GHZ would bring more into the picture, which is fair enough... lets go 4Ghz then hahaha... I've amended my original post! Thanks fellas.

 

[pugheaven]

Intel's TDPs are done with "artistic freedom".
If cooling can cope with the heat, under full AVX load 8 core 9900K chasing advertised clocks is like 200W TDP CPU.
10 core 10900K? Yep, toward 250W.

For comparison AMD's 16 core is ~140W max, unless you change BIOS settings from stock.

Yeah it's a lot, this old 22nm chip I have here is taking 215W on full load when doing FPU calculations... that's a lot of heat generated that...

 

[pugheaven]

Not 4.6Ghz...........................at the moment. But will be when i put my SS on it at the weekend.

Thats' as near as damn it though mate, so that's a good one to compare to so,if we just took that figure for now is looking like the AMD over an old Xeon is around 17% faster give or take clock for clock for 1 CPU... just based on CPUZ which obviously isn't the be all and end all, but at least it's consistant in it's findings... I wonder if you could do one at as close to 4Ghz as possible mate just for me, as I've amended this thread to a 4Ghz to get more different CPU's in here to just get a ROH.

CPUZ SCORES @4Ghz
E5 Xeon 1860V2: Single Core = 411.8, Multi Thread = 4062.1

 

[pugheaven]

Thanks for everyone so far we're now getting a feeling for single core performance now at 4Ghz for varying chips and it's quite interesting actually...

CPU-Z SCORES @4Ghz (give or take error on bus)
E5 Xeon 1860 V2: Single Core = 411.8 (Pugheaven)
Ryzen7 3700X: Single Core = 481.7 (EdButler)
Ryzen5 2400G: Single Core = 455.8 (sandys)
Ryzen Threadripper 2970x: Single Core = 464.7 (sandys)
Ryzen5 3600: Single Core = 476.6 (Humbug)

Would now love to see some Intel's as well and some more different Ryzens if possible... be nice to get everyone a single core score at 4ghz... however upto now... from fastest to slowest on a single core there is a maximum of what, circa 14% difference with mine being the slowest expectidly.