*** Mid-2012 Android phone buyers guide (high-end) ***

Man of Honour
Joined
2 Jan 2009
Posts
62,152
I have written this as a reference point for people who aren't sure which phone to buy. I've seen plenty of people (myself included) write more or less the same post over and over again about which phone to buy between the current best Android phones.

This thread can also be used as a point of discussion between the mentioned phones if people wish. Any suggestions/additions are welcome!


Last year, the de facto 'best' Android phone was the Samsung Galaxy S II. There was little justification for not owning one. While it still holds up well, it has been surpassed by the 2012 phone models as you would expect, and the competition this year is a lot tighter.

Things of note: I have left out the Samsung Galaxy Nexus and Samsung Galaxy Note, as they weren't released in 2012, and the former has lackluster hardware and the latter is going to be too big for most people. If you aren't bothered about the size, the Galaxy Note is still very much a contender but you'll have to judge the merits of that by yourself. They are also priced below the phones at the top end of the market. The Xperia S is also a fair shout but I've left that out for similar reasons. Its only stand out feature is the camera and despite having the highest megapixel count, the performance doesn't seem to match up to the three phones below. It does have a camera button though which some people may like.

As ever, it's important that you try all of the phones in a shop where possible. Obviously in doing that you're unable to properly test everything, so give this a read first.

So, the phones in question are: Samsung Galaxy S III | HTC One X | HTC One S

2HcvLl.jpg

First up, TLDR version:

  1. Design - Tie
  2. Screen - Tie between One X and S3
  3. Battery life - HTC One S, very closely followed by S3
  4. Internals - Tie between One S and S3
  5. Software skins - Tie
  6. Phone/cell performance - Tie between S3 and One X
  7. Audio performance - Tie between One S and S3
  8. Camera - S3
  9. Video recording - S3
  10. Connectivity (NFC, etc) - Tie between One X and S3
  11. Storage - S3, followed by One X
  12. ROM/Dev support - Tie between One X and S3
  13. Price - One S is cheapest

Design, Size and Build

Much of this is going to come down entirely to personal preference, so there's no clear winner here. You'll have to decide which phone you prefer the design and size of yourself.

The Galaxy S III and One X both have 4.8 and 4.7 inch screens respectively, so they are larger than the One S. The design of the Galaxy S III is more ergonomic than the One X, so it doesn't feel quite as big, despite being bigger.

The designs of the three phones are quite different. The black HTC One S has a micro arc oxidised aluminium unibody. It's currently the only high end phone with a metal design, which some people prefer over the plastic alternatives. The grey model is an anodized aluminium uni-body, which is more slippery than the black model.

The polycarbonate unibody shell of the HTC One X has a matte finish, which has a very nice feel but the phone is a bit slippery as a result. It's available in white or grey. The camera lens protrudes quite a lot from the back of the phone, so you might want to be mindful of that.

The Galaxy S III has a 'hyperglaze' back, which is grippier than the other phones, and has an almost soft feel to it. It's available in blue or white. The blue model has a habit of changing colour depending on lighting conditions. In darker rooms it will look black, and outdoors it looks light blue/purple.

All three phones have a notification LED. The HTC ones are below the earpiece on the front of the phone, and they aren't that great. You can see it fine if you are near the phone (indoors), but from a distance and in a bright room/outdoors it's not great. On the Galaxy S III, the LED is larger, as well as being RGB so can be customised to show different colours for different notifications. You can see it much more easily than on the HTC phones.

The Screens

This is more or less a tie between the One X and Galaxy S III.

Which you prefer will come down to what you use the phone for, if you watch a lot of videos or play a lot of games, the S III SAMOLED is going to be a better choice here. Due to the vibrant colours and near-perfect blacks, it will provide a better experience for media consumption.

For everything else, the IPS LCD2 One X screen delivers a sharper image with more natural colours, at the expense of grey coloured blacks. Web browsing, email and general app use are going to be slightly better on the One X.

Ultimately, you can't go wrong with either. Both screens are roughly the same size (the S3 is marginally bigger), and the viewing angles on both are excellent.

The One S takes second place. There's nothing to get too excited about when it comes to the One S screen. It's a solid SuperAMOLED panel, but has a pentile matrix (something that some people don't like), and also lacks the sharpness of the other screens at 256ppi. You get vibrant colours and excellent black levels as standard, but it's lacking with the qHD resolution (540x960) falling short of the 720p resolution on the other screens.

The Battery Life

The winner here is the HTC One S. Due to the power efficient Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 processor and moderately sized screen, the battery life on the HTC One S is possibly the best on a modern smart phone to date (Razr MAXX aside). The battery isn't particularly big at 1650 mAh, but it doesn't need to be.

Not far behind is the Samsung Galaxy S III, despite the large screen, Samsung have well optimised software and have included a generous 2100 mAh battery.

Behind the S III is the HTC One X, despite having a not particularly power efficient CPU and large screen, HTC saw fit to include a fairly small 1800 mAh battery. Overall this gives respectable battery life, but nothing more.

The batteries on the HTC phones are both fixed, due to the unibody, you can't replace them. The Galaxy S III has a completely removable back, so you can have spare batteries and replace them with ease.

Internals

To keep this fairly brief, the HTC One S has been equipped with the most technologically advanced mobile cores present in the S4 Snapdragon. They use less power and deliver exceptional performance per core.

The Samsung Galaxy S III is sporting Samsung's new quad-core Exynos 4212 CPU, and this is also very quick. Generally there's little difference in the performance of the One S and S III.

The One X has the Tegra 3, which is a more budget CPU made by Nvidia. The inclusion of this was for marketing purposes and you shouldn't assume that it's going to be better just because it's quad-core, it isn't. Having said that it still provides very solid performance so it's not a huge issue, but there are times when the 'weaker' architecture struggles a bit.

GPU-wise there isn't a huge difference between them, but the S3 is on top, followed by the One X, then the One S. The HTC One S runs a lot cooler than the other two phones as well, the Galaxy S III has even been known to explode... in one case. ;) Don't worry about that!

Having looked at all of the available benchmarks, I'd have to personally say that the Galaxy S III seems to deliver the best all round performance, followed very closely by the One S, then the One X.

Some benchmarks: Here

Software Skins

Again, this could well be a case of personal preference.

HTC very heavily modify Android with 'HTC Sense', their own software skin. It completely changes the look and feel of the software. It provides a more complete (but intrusive) package than the Samsung alternative.

Samsung use TouchWiz, which is lighter than HTC Sense and stays a bit more true to the feel of Android, but it doesn't look particularly great.

Thankfully both of the above points aren't too much of an issue if you're happy to use a custom launcher and modify the phone. You won't see it most of the time.

Phone Performance

The earpiece and loudspeakers on all three phones are loud and clear, and the signal performance of the One X and Galaxy S III seem fairly similar.

The loudspeaker on the S III does seem to be a bit louder, but not much.

The One S is generally fine here too, but it does have a signal problem that is causing some people problems. It seems to have a very weak signal in some areas, perhaps varying depending on what mast you are connected to... it's currently unclear. This is certainly something to take note of, though it may not affect you much, if at all.

Audio Performance

I'd have to call this a tie between the One S and Galaxy S III. Some places say one is better than the other, but I imagine the difference is really very small.

The One X lags behind a bit, but still delivers respectable audio performance, however audiophiles may find it below-par.

The Camera

This is a close one.

I've got to award first place to the Galaxy S III. It seems to produce the most realistic images, as well as capturing detail exceptionally well.

However, the HTC One X and S are tied in a very close second, and their camera software is preferred by a lot of people to the TouchWiz alternative.

Generally speaking, you'll get a great picture out of any of the three phones.

HD Video Recording

The Galaxy S III is the clear winner here. The video recording on the HTC One phones just simply isn't good enough. The light metering is very harsh, and there is quite a bit of stuttering.

Individually, the One series video recording seems quite fine, but when put into a comparison, it gets shown up.

Connectivity (NFC, GPS, etc)

There are generally no great differences here.

The HTC phones both have standard A-GPS which offers decent performance, but the S III has GLONASS on top of that.

The HTC One S is missing NFC, which is a bit of a strange omission and could be a bit rubbish if Google Wallet and other NFC services really take off over the next 12-24 months.

Storage

If a lot of storage is important, there is only one phone to consider here, and that's the Galaxy S III. The 'standard' model has 16GB of built in storage, and an SD card slot, which supports up to 64GB of expandable storage. There is a 32GB version available as well, and possibly will be a 64GB model in future.

The HTC One X has a respectable 32GB of storage (around 26GB available), but there is no expansion slot, so you're limited to that.

The HTC One S has a rather poor 16GB of space, which is also non-expandable (around 12GB available - 10GB for photo/video and 2GB for apps).

You get a pretty hefty Dropbox allowance with all of these phones (25-50GB), but using that will eat into your data allowance - watch out for that.

ROM/Developer support

Currently the HTC One X is the best supported phone, but the Galaxy S III will inevitably overtake it before long.

The One S isn't massively popular and development is suffering due to that.

Price

The HTC One S is generally the cheapest of the three, and the One X and S III are a similar sort of price. There are always deals around so check these sites if you want a contract:

http://www.buymobilephones.net/

http://www.mobiles.co.uk/

http://www.mobilephonesdirect.co.uk/

http://www.dialaphone.co.uk/

Phones on the Horizon

It's possible that HTC will release a revamped One X in a few months, but this is currently all just speculation. The next lot of Google developer 'Nexus' phones will likely be out around this time as well.

The iPhone 5 is due for release towards the end of the year, but again, there are no set dates for that and it isn't an Android phone anyway!

Is now a good time to buy an Android phone? Yes, it is.

More on future HTC rumours: Here

Honourable Mentions:

Samsung Galaxy Note

This was a tough one to leave out, but it's just too big for most people. However, if you like the size, you can't go far wrong with it. It offers a huge 5.3" Super AMOLED screen, a 'smart' S-Pen stylus, internals with respectable power, expandable storage, a decent camera, and so on. If you like the size, you may prefer this to anything else. Battery life suffers when the screen is on.

Samsung Galaxy Nexus

The main benefit of this is the stock Android experience. The camera, video recording and internals are all fairly poor and don't hold up too well against the 'big 3' Android phones, but it's perfectly capable and can be had for under £300 from new. The 4.7" 720p SuperAMOLED screen is the stand out hardware feature.

Sony Xperia S

A bit of a mixed bag. Nice design, very decent 720p screen with a huge 342ppi (overkill in honesty). It has the highest megapixel camera but that doesn't make it the best. The camera button is one feature that may tempt people.

Samsung Galaxy S II

Still a very decent phone, only really let down by the screen, which now looks a bit old hat. You probably have one of these already and are considering an upgrade...! Is the upgrade worth it? Absolutely.

Motorola Droid Razr MAXX

A huge battery, but everything else is a bit sub-par. If you aren't worried about specifics and want a huge battery, this is definitely worth a look. It's Motorola though, so kiss software updates goodbye.


Disclaimer: Everything here should be more or less accurate. I'm not one to obsess over benchmarks so if anything regarding the internals is incorrect, please say and I will amend it.
 
Last edited:
Very good guide Robbo! Have some stars :)


For the design, maybe add about the feel/finish of the mobiles i.e. the black S has a ceramic back (aluminium uni-body, which has been micro arc oxidised) and the grey model has just an anodized aluminium uni-body, which apparently has a more slippy feel to it than the ceramic back on the black S, the X a nice matte back and the GS 3 a smooth/slippy back with a glossy/brushed finish etc. then mention how the GS 3 changes colours depending on light from purple to blue to nearly black :p And how the camera lens sticks out by quite a bit for the X and a tiny bit for the S where as the on the GS 3 it is indented a wee bit.

Also the notification LED, how ****/tacky it is on the S/X (IMO) when compared to the likes of the desire and GS 3 notification LED and that you can't use any other colours for the S/X, only green and red/orange where as with the GS 3 you can use pretty much any colour you want iirc.

Maybe mention about the heat of the mobiles? As I always see people mentioning how hot their mobiles get when doing stuff etc. so the S runs the coolest followed by the GS 3 and then the X.

And for battery life, that you can take out the battery on the GS 3 but can't do the same for the S or X thus meaning you can carry spares and/or use an extended battery (when released) for the GS 3

EDIT:

Also for the S you have 10GB for photos, videos etc. and 2.21GB is for apps
 
Last edited:
Good work sir. Can I ask, is the 'revamped One X' you refer to the one with the next-gen Qualcomm SOC? (If memory serves, this SOC will have quad core and the next iteration of adreno.)

Ginga
 
Audio Performance

The One S suffers from quite a bit of radio interference with headphones on and has a quiet speaker. I wouldn't rate it very highly for Audio. (something like the Arc is noticeably better, GSMArena were off the mark here)

The Galaxy S III is (probably) the daddy.

Phones on the Horizon

There's a glut of WP8 devices coming out towards the end of the year. They all have 720p screens, 1GB and the S4 Snapdragon.

Regarding HTC.

The One S (S4/520e model) should be replaced with the S3/560e and a newer high end model. This version will have a 4.3" 720p LCD2/IPS screen, NFC and possibly a microSD card slot. It'll come in both WP8 (HTC Accord) and Android flavours, the Android version might get slightly better specs, like the S4 Pro.
Then there's the monster One XXL (Zeneth for WP8) that should drop Tegra 3 for the S4 Snapdragon Prime (or Pro), 2GB and hopefully a bigger battery/storage.

These upgrades fixes most of the niggles/problems of the current X/S range, so it's definitely worth waiting for.

Also watch out for the 6th gen iPhone, if they use a cortex 32nm cortex A15 the rest can't be far away.

I don't agree with the worthy upgrade of s2 to w/e tho

Me too :D
 
^ Yep, well done! This'll be a good place for all the Samsung/HTC/Apple fanboys to argue over which brand is better too.

...and we all know Sony (should) make the best phones! :p Xperia GX 4 life j0!
 
Surely the disclaimer should be at the top and state in large, bold letters that you don't actually own all of these phones and you've gathered this from reading reviews and forums. No?
 
Surely the disclaimer should be at the top and state in large, bold letters that you don't actually own all of these phones and you've gathered this from reading reviews and forums. No?

Well no, because I haven't put forward much that's opinion. It's mostly factual stuff. People can decide for themselves. If I've said something that's wrong, please point it out.

I've used all three quite a bit and will own two of them very soon anyway (currently just the One X).
 
Also Robbo, might want to mention that the S4 version of the S is being phased out and replaced with an older gen S3, which is no were as good as the S4 and HTC have overclocked it as well so the battery life will be pretty poor and the heat that it will give off will be quite a lot :eek:

EDIT:

The S4 version has a clock speed of 1.5GHz and the S3 a speed of 1.7GHz

Only in European and Asian markets for now, but it will be coming here as well soon enough I think.

The One S suffers from quite a bit of radio interference with headphones on and has a quiet speaker. I wouldn't rate it very highly for Audio. (something like the Arc is noticeably better, GSMArena were off the mark here)

I don't know why some people think the audio on the S is quiet :confused: :eek: (you're not the only one who has said that sarge)

I find it so loud, that for all the youtube videos etc. I keep it at like 2/5 of the volume bar and then for music it is exceptionally loud with the HTC enhancer effect enabled, so I keep it at the lowest placement of the volume bar (loudspeaker that is)

You must be deaf sarge!!!! :p

The reason gsmarena rated it so highly was due to how clean the output was, not just for loudness and I don't think they took radio interference into the equation :p Although pretty much all mobile devices suffer from this.

This'll be a good place for all the Samsung/HTC/Apple fanboys to argue over which brand is better too.

:D
 
Last edited:
I don't think you will find many people who have actually used the galaxy note for any length of time who will complain its too big :P - while it was officially launched October 2011 it wasn't really readily available here until very late 2011/early 2012.

I will just quickly sum it up as it definitely deserves a footnote in 2012.

The high point of this phone is its great screen - 1280x800 with good blacks and vibrant colors - it is pentile based but the inherent pentile issues are rarely if ever noticeable. A few people have found the colors go a little sickly or darker areas a bit splotchy if you use it for extended periods of time with the brightness ramped up to max but this is probably the same for any OLED display if pushed to its max. Its very useable as a hybrid tablet for many tablet uses and very comfortable for watching HD movies on - being just large enough for the detail of 720p to be useful without having to squint but also without sacrificing on the portability of the device.

Battery life is average - its a large capacity battery 2500mAh but it needs it to power that display - around 2 days of moderate use is possible before the battery level is low but that can be extended a bit with tweaking i.e. having GPS off.

All other attributes its very average camera is good but nothing special, same for HD recording which it does fine but results are middle of the road. Sound quality and useage as a phone again is very middle of the road nothing wrong with it but nothing special. Connectivity, storage, ROM development again are all pretty standard fare theres no dedicated HDMI out socket but it can be done with a USB MHL adapter and the phone can also support a keyboard or mouse without any fuss using a USB OTG adapater - which can actually be quite useful given the screensize.
 
I will just quickly sum it up as it definitely deserves a footnote in 2012.

Absolutely, it definitely does!

People are free to add things like this, that's the point! It's not just me telling people what to buy, it's just a place to provide the information so they can decide. I'll edit in what I feel is necessary. :)
 
Great write up Robbo
Might be worth mentioning the Optimus 4X as well, tegra, but initial pricing suggests it might be a cheaper high end phone?
 
Just to be picky the GPU's aren't really that even, well not across the board, the One S is the weakest technically (but not far off the X and has the much lower res screen so in practice...) but the GS3 is significantly better than both.

The benchmarks you linked to only included one 'proper' (non-vsync limited) GPU bench and the One X is about 12% quicker than the S, the GS3 is then >60% quicker than the X.

Ultimately doesn't matter though with current games/usage, unless you're a pedantic geek like me :)
 
^
Actually the One S probably runs games much faster than the other two ;) (They usually run at FWVGA and Adreno 225 absolutely owns every game at that res)
It's also 28nm so I can play a maxed out GTA3 for almost an hour and loose only ~33% battery, oh and still have a cool and comfortable phone :) (cpu usage never goes above 55% btw) Can the International One X do that? Someone Play GTA3 for an hour and find out! :D

Current 3D benchmarks are fairly rubbish too. Basemark/Nenamark favours Adreno architecture, GLBenchmark is good for SGX/Mali and off screen benchmarks are just terrible for real game loads/usage. We need proper game engine fps results for the pedantic geeks!

At the end of the day all of these phones are can play every single game released on Android. (I'd lump them in the same class as the SGS2/Sensation tbh, don't forget we should see next gen 100 GFLOP gpus fairly soon)
 
Excellent write up. Should also add the LG 4X for comparison due out soon in Europe.

4.7" True HD-IPS LCD screen,
Teg 3,
16GB on board,
Removable battery,
Expandable storage.
 
I think it's a shame you've left the Nexus out purely based on hardware. Yes, the hardware is dated but the software experience is arguably the best on any current Android phone, unencumbered by manufacturer bloat. It's also the only device to have Jellybean.
 
Back
Top Bottom