In fairness, they werent the ones calling a large group of actually quite attractive women ugly.
TBH, i am a bit confused myself as to what cheets point is.
I don't know whether he thinks all the pictures of women he has posted pictures of are ugly or whether he is just making a point that make-up makes women look better...which everyone already knows?!
I'd be interested to see what the people who posted/quoted Cheets pic actually look like. It's out of order to post his image anyway, but I'd find it interesting to see what these self-proclaimed champions of the girls in the OP actually look like.
So someone intentionally searching and posting someone's pic posted somewhere else in the forums in order to seek help just to poke fun is a "sad ****"?
My wife is currently obsessed with watching America's/Britain's/Antarctica's Next Top Model type programs. Apart from it being bloody dreadful TV you notice that most of them or rather unattractive and the decent looking ones generally get told they aren't good enough.
your first post/thread title is 'frauding' us - as has already been pointed out many times they look weird because their features have been distorted by the camera lens.
Most of them would likely still look super hot without make up - the thread is pointless - all you've illustrated is that people look weird when their pic is taken up close with a short lens.
I know that women like to buy heat magazine for the dodgy pap shots of 'clebs' looking fugly etc.. but you're just kidding yourself if you think that supermodels somehow turn into hideous creatures without makeup.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.