Money no object

Permabanned
Joined
19 Oct 2007
Posts
6,322
Location
.
Ok a bit like my thread in motors a few months ago.

You win the lottery, you have money no object money.

You have to choose one camera, 3 lenses, and any other accessories.

What do you choose.

Rules are, no more than three lenses, and one camera, unlimited budget, camera to use not to "sell to afford others"

The point of the thread ? im interested in what you would realistically pick both camera and lens wise...
 
No one seems interested in wide angle photography from your replies ?

Personally

D3
17-35 F2.8
24-70 F2.8
200-400 F4.

The reason ? 17 is plenty wide on FF...

24-70 on FF is perfectly for walk about and portraits

and 200-400 is perfect for wildlife photography, ofcourse you would have full gitzo support and teleconverters available to you...
 
Leica S2-P seems like a good setup for money no object too, 37 megapixel.

Only issue is it only goes upto 1250 ISO, but then all the lenses are F2.8 so its not a specific issue..
 
Ok :)

One : D3X + 17-35mm F2.8

Two : D3X + 17-35mm F2.8 + 70-200mm F2.8

Then again D3s for sport and D3X for landscape.

It got me thinking earlier, the 1dmk4 AF motor is much better than the D3s, but the D3s iso is far better than the 1dmk4, both in the way you select your iso and the iso performance. So what if you were a war correspondent ? Combat photography..high iso needed for low light, but super fast af needed for combat action... what has best of both ?
 
The thing with filters - i would be really worried about scratching the front element on a 14-24...
 
Back
Top Bottom