Monitor dilemma

Associate
Joined
4 Jan 2009
Posts
35
Hello everyone - it's been almost two years since I last logged in here and I could use some advice. Here's the situation:

Currently I've got a pair of 780Tis driving an old Ilyama Prolite E2710HDSD and a slightly less old Asus VG278HE. Both are 27" 1080p. The Asus can manage 144Hz but because the Ilyama only does 60Hz and I tend not to use exclusive fullscreen, things generally run at 60Hz. No real complaints (although I can see pixellation if I pay a little attention) but that may just be because it's what I'm used to. Hey, 320x240 with 16 colours used to be pretty snazzy back in the day...

Now GeForce 10 is arriving and while I'm not quite as enthused by the initial offerings as I might have been (dear God, those prices :eek:), it's got me looking at upgrading my displays. The rig is used for gaming (because what else needs this kind of horsepower in a home PC?) with the occasional bit of wannabe YouTubing on the side.

So here's where I need some advice from all you lovely people who probably know considerably more on the subject than I do. I'm currently considering several options:

1) Do nothing. Wait for 1080 prices to drop as the market finds a level and for 2160p/144Hz monitors to hit the market. Then find three buddies and some clown masks for some...err...'fundraising'.

2) Buy a single 1440p/144 Hz monitor to replace the Ilyama, hopefully taking the whole display up to 144Hz even if it does mean mixing resolutions for a bit (is this still possible?). Then wait for 1080 prices to hit the realms of sanity, 2180/144 monitors to enter the market and/or round up the aforementioned three buddies and clown masks as needed before replacing the Asus and the 780Tis. Would leave me with a 2160/144 and a 1440/144 but that would still be a considerable improvement over the current rig.

3) As (2) but replace both monitors rather than just the Ilyama. This does mean foregoing 2160p for several years, but prices should be more reasonable when I upgrade as a consequence and I don't have to worry about mixing resolutions across the two displays and any hiccups that might cause.

4) Do things the other way around, replacing the Tis first - initially with a single 1080 then replacing the monitors as 2160/144s become available and maybe a second 1080 if that proves necessary.

5) Win the lottery and get 8Pack to think about it instead. That rig at Insomnia Edinburgh looked sweet. When it was behaving itself...


So, I'm open to advice and suggestions on plans and particular models to go for. Fire away:
 
Hi mate. I'd consider getting a single gsync solution (if you plan on staying NVidia that is). Nothing crazy money - a 1080p or 1440p 27" with a plan to adding a 2nd or going ultrawide later on. The latter is my plan - after seeing and playing with ultrawide, there is no going back!
 
Well, NVidia seem to have a lock on the high end market atm. GSync seems to slap a hefty premium onto the price though - is it really that good?
 
Well, NVidia seem to have a lock on the high end market atm. GSync seems to slap a hefty premium onto the price though - is it really that good?

Don't confuse 'high end' with 'high priced'. As you mention, GSYNC adds an enormous percentage onto the cost of the monitor, even when you can find exactly the same panel elsewhere for much, much cheaper, often with Freesync compatibility.

As for the 1080s, I'm not sure what you feel is a reasonable price. Once the preorder gouging is finished the cards will quickly settle at a level they'll maintain for an extended period. We don't yet know what that level is, but suffice to say it won't be less than £400.
 
GSync seems to slap a hefty premium onto the price though - is it really that good?

I guess it depends how fussy you are re. tearing vs. the input lag that comes with vsync, and general sensitivity to fps / choppiness. Tearing and vsync lag wind me right up, plus without gsync/freesync, anything below 60 fps looks jarringly choppy to my eyes. So for me they're the biggest improvement to monitor tech in ages. I'd choose 1080p with gsync/freesync over 1440p (or higher) without, all day long. It's really all good. Games look and run better even at lower frame rates. tbh it's probably worth offsetting the premium gsync adds with the extra life you'll get out your cards as a result.
 
Ok, so worth getting adaptive VSync of some sort then. I note that VESA included FreeSync as an option in DisplayPort 1.2a (and therefore presumably 1.3 and 1.4). Are NVidia basically admitting defeat with FastSync not requiring the GSync modules and are we likely to see FreeSync support from Team Green as a result? Because if so, there's little point in coughing up the premium...

Reasonably priced...eh, more a case of seeing where things stabilise.
 
Back
Top Bottom