OK I'm monitor ignorant so excuse what will seem to most as a dumb question.
I'm an older geezer who's decided to have a go at gaming so while I understand the basics of putting together a computer, I know virtually nothing about gaming & monitors and I'm simply winging it as I go.
I'm waiting until later in September after my holidays etc to update my existing mobo etc with something like a Ryzen 1600/2600, but the other day I treated myself to a GTX 1060 3Gb mini and being impatient, stuck it in my old mobo with it's Phenom 11 x 4 955 BE cpu to see what would happen and I was actually amazed at the performance from something as old and outdated as the Phenom cpu.
I downloaded the free version of 'Fortnite' and while I was rubbish at playing it, even with most of the settings on 'epic' and a 120 fps limit I was able to get it silky smooth at 60-90 fps average with no trouble whatsoever. I could have got far higher fps counts by lowering the quality but I wanted to see what it could achieve with the highest settings.
I had originally intended to just go for Ryzen 2400 G APU based system for entry level gaming but I'm so glad I didn't as I now think I'd have been rather disappointed in the performance after seeing this. The performance of the 2400 G APU is only similar to a GTX 1030 so hardly suited to more demanding games.
My current monitor is an older HP VGA-only monitor with a maximum display size of 1680 x 1050 but with an HDMI-VGA adaptor I got it running perfectly and crisply with the GPU and will be more than adequate until after I upgrade my cpu etc and then I'll buy a new monitor.
My question is: as my monitor has only 85% of the pixel count of a 1080p screen, if I bought a new monitor now would I see any marked improvement in both the visual aspects as well as a reduction in fps count? I would assume that more pixels would be sharper but take more rendering and therefore lower the fps performance...is that correct?
While I'm not exactly skint, I'd rather wait until after I get the bits to upgrade the computer ( CPU + Mobo + 16Gb ram and new PSU) before I buy a new 1080p monitor and then if I make do with this for the time being, I can maybe afford a better quality monitor to match my new upgrade.
I doubt I'll be anything more than a casual gamer and I certainly won't be a maximum fps junkie, but I do like to buy decent quality items rather than something cheap that I won't be happy with.
I'm an older geezer who's decided to have a go at gaming so while I understand the basics of putting together a computer, I know virtually nothing about gaming & monitors and I'm simply winging it as I go.
I'm waiting until later in September after my holidays etc to update my existing mobo etc with something like a Ryzen 1600/2600, but the other day I treated myself to a GTX 1060 3Gb mini and being impatient, stuck it in my old mobo with it's Phenom 11 x 4 955 BE cpu to see what would happen and I was actually amazed at the performance from something as old and outdated as the Phenom cpu.
I downloaded the free version of 'Fortnite' and while I was rubbish at playing it, even with most of the settings on 'epic' and a 120 fps limit I was able to get it silky smooth at 60-90 fps average with no trouble whatsoever. I could have got far higher fps counts by lowering the quality but I wanted to see what it could achieve with the highest settings.
I had originally intended to just go for Ryzen 2400 G APU based system for entry level gaming but I'm so glad I didn't as I now think I'd have been rather disappointed in the performance after seeing this. The performance of the 2400 G APU is only similar to a GTX 1030 so hardly suited to more demanding games.
My current monitor is an older HP VGA-only monitor with a maximum display size of 1680 x 1050 but with an HDMI-VGA adaptor I got it running perfectly and crisply with the GPU and will be more than adequate until after I upgrade my cpu etc and then I'll buy a new monitor.
My question is: as my monitor has only 85% of the pixel count of a 1080p screen, if I bought a new monitor now would I see any marked improvement in both the visual aspects as well as a reduction in fps count? I would assume that more pixels would be sharper but take more rendering and therefore lower the fps performance...is that correct?
While I'm not exactly skint, I'd rather wait until after I get the bits to upgrade the computer ( CPU + Mobo + 16Gb ram and new PSU) before I buy a new 1080p monitor and then if I make do with this for the time being, I can maybe afford a better quality monitor to match my new upgrade.
I doubt I'll be anything more than a casual gamer and I certainly won't be a maximum fps junkie, but I do like to buy decent quality items rather than something cheap that I won't be happy with.