Looking at overpaying on our mortgage and lender (Nationwide) offers 3 choices:
For what it's worth; we are at the start of a 5-year fixed deal.
Can anyone explain which option might be 'better' (and why)?
I have googled and there appears to be a lot of conflicting information, from people who appeared unsure of the advice they were giving.
I'm probably not going to explain this well - but my thoughts are:
As far as I can tell 1 & 2 aren't much different, except that you get a bit more flexibility with 2. Ie, in future (if times were hard), you're not committed to slightly higher monthly payments - but if not then you can voluntarily make payments equivalent to 1, which result in the same overall payments and interest.
Now option 3 is where I'm not quite so sure - I would assume there is a subtle difference from option 2, but I'm not exactly sure what? Is there an implication that our 'fixed' payments get recalculated periodically (monthly/yearly) during the 5-year fixed deal? And that by choosing option 3, they remain truly fixed until the deal ends and we move onto a new rate?
Appreciate if anyone can explain the difference between the 3 options and what they would advise choosing.
At the moment I am leaning to option 3.
- Pay off my mortgage earlier by reducing my mortgage term
- Reduce my future monthly payments
- Keep my existing payment and term as-is. (At the next natural mortgage payment change, i.e. interest rate change, my payment will be automatically recalculated).
For what it's worth; we are at the start of a 5-year fixed deal.
Can anyone explain which option might be 'better' (and why)?
I have googled and there appears to be a lot of conflicting information, from people who appeared unsure of the advice they were giving.
I'm probably not going to explain this well - but my thoughts are:
- If you overpay by a fixed amount (n pounds) for the life of the mortgage, then 1 & 2 are effectively the same.
- If you stop overpaying at any point, then 1 would work out cheaper in the long run, but only because it results in higher 'standard' monthly payments.
- If you stop overpaying at any point and then 'overpay' 2 to match what 1 would have been - you get back to both being the same.
As far as I can tell 1 & 2 aren't much different, except that you get a bit more flexibility with 2. Ie, in future (if times were hard), you're not committed to slightly higher monthly payments - but if not then you can voluntarily make payments equivalent to 1, which result in the same overall payments and interest.
Now option 3 is where I'm not quite so sure - I would assume there is a subtle difference from option 2, but I'm not exactly sure what? Is there an implication that our 'fixed' payments get recalculated periodically (monthly/yearly) during the 5-year fixed deal? And that by choosing option 3, they remain truly fixed until the deal ends and we move onto a new rate?
Appreciate if anyone can explain the difference between the 3 options and what they would advise choosing.
At the moment I am leaning to option 3.
Last edited: