I've just read this on a thread and thought i'd start a new one..
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally Posted by eidolon
MOT = £85 a year (£50.15+1/2hr labour+VAT at my local indy)
but then fox replied with..
Did you know he is breaking the law charging you that? The DOT sets a maximum charge for an MOT test. He can't then bill you for 30 minutes labour as well.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
K i'm sorry for my lack of quotes
I recently had my mot done last month and was expecting them to make something up to do me for. After the MOT they said that everything was fine except a corroded brake pipe (yea..bit random
) which needed replacing and they quoted me £75 for the part, i couldnt get hold of one elsewhere and i'd left the MOT till one of the last days so i felt i had no option but to accept. When i got the MOT/receipt it showed that i'd been charged £25 for the part and £50 for the labour which must have taken about 20 mins 
So in total it was £55 for the mot + £75 for this part, £50 of which being labour.
Were they breaking the law? I'm not 100% on this but they may / may not have taken it next door to whats probably a separate firm where this work was carried out. Is that possibly their loophole? is there any really good sources of info on this?
I'm keen to find out as if they're on very dodgy ground i'll be arguing for my money back
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally Posted by eidolon
MOT = £85 a year (£50.15+1/2hr labour+VAT at my local indy)
but then fox replied with..
Did you know he is breaking the law charging you that? The DOT sets a maximum charge for an MOT test. He can't then bill you for 30 minutes labour as well.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
K i'm sorry for my lack of quotes

I recently had my mot done last month and was expecting them to make something up to do me for. After the MOT they said that everything was fine except a corroded brake pipe (yea..bit random


So in total it was £55 for the mot + £75 for this part, £50 of which being labour.
Were they breaking the law? I'm not 100% on this but they may / may not have taken it next door to whats probably a separate firm where this work was carried out. Is that possibly their loophole? is there any really good sources of info on this?
I'm keen to find out as if they're on very dodgy ground i'll be arguing for my money back
