I was in Halfords today looking at Mountain bikes as I was considering buying a VooDoo Bizango. I was hoping to try out a medium but they only had a large in stock. I'm 5"9 so broadly between large and medium sizes.
Shop the latest Voodoo Bizango Mens Mountain Bike - S, M, L, XL Frames at Halfords UK
www.halfords.com
Having sat on the large it felt reasonablly comfortable and I had plenty of standover clearance. Though they didn't have a Bizango in Medium I tried another Voodoo bike (Braag or Horde IIRC) in Medium as I assumed the sizing/geometry would be similar across the range.
I'm still a bit unsure as the handlebars felt a bit low on the Medium with the seat adjusted correctly whereas on the Large I'd say they were marginally higher than I'd want them to be. Having said that it looked like on the large size it would be easy to take out a couple of spacers in the stem to drop them to what should be the perfect height so I'm erring towards going with the Large size. The sales guy in the store recommended that I'd be better with the large bike as well though most of the guides on the Halfords site recommend Medium for my height?
Height (Inch) | Height (cm) | Frame Size |
---|
5' 5" - 5' 9" | 165 - 175 | S (16") |
5' 8" - 5' 11" | 172 - 180 | M (18") |
5' 10" - 6' 1" | 178 - 185 | L (19") |
6' 0" - 6' 4" | 183 - 193 | XL (20" |
What's the general consensus in Mountain Biking terms when you're between two sizes of bike? Is it better to size up or size down? I've searched online but there seem to be mixed opinions on the topic!
Have any of you guys been in a similar quandry?