• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

MSI & ASUS Prep 4GHz RAM AGESA v1.2 BIOS - slow memory can fclk itself

Associate
OP
Joined
22 Oct 2012
Posts
1,089
All else equal (inc timings) what benefits are people seeing from clocking infinity fabric and RAM at 2GHz instead of a more typical 1800MHz? It would be a ~11% increase in bandwidth, less if timings had to be slackened. But is that actually humanly noticeable in any real workloads?
There's a good analysis Premiumbuilds did that showed ~3800 MHz did give benefit but performance actually dropped after that, even with a 1:1 fclk to speed ratio. However I'd expect the drop off to shift to 4 GHz plus with AGESA 1.2 and onwards.

Ryzen-Zen-3-RAM-Timespy-CPU-score-vs-RAM-Speed-1024x696.png


Ryzen-Zen-3-RAM-Ram-Speed-vs-FPS-5800X-Raibow-6-1024x687.png


Source: https://premiumbuilds.com/features/zen-3-ram-speeds-benchmark-analysis/
 
Associate
OP
Joined
22 Oct 2012
Posts
1,089
Don't see what the obsession is with 2/4GHz tbh... I have a Gigabyte Aorus Master which has the 1.2 code and yes, I am able to run stable with 2GHz IF and 4GHz RAM... but I have to go above 1.4V on my RAM. Considering I am running 1900MHz IF and 3800MHz RAM with 1.0V and 1.34V respectively, I don't see the point in chucking in the extra heat and voltage just for a 100MHz jump which doesn't actually amount to anything in terms of performance.
It's a bit OTT of us granted. A lot of it is just the psychological 4GHz threshold, with a dash of speed making a decent difference for Zen 3.
 
Associate
OP
Joined
22 Oct 2012
Posts
1,089
^^ It's interesting, the charts (copied below) did show a significant uplift in performance from increasing memory and fclk. There is a drop off above 3800; which suggest that the max speed achievable by all is about as fast as you want to go with Zen 3. The expectation/hope is that this drop-off point also increases by 200 MHz for AGESA 1.2.

1:1 fclk to speed ratio

Ryzen-Zen-3-RAM-Timespy-CPU-score-vs-RAM-Speed-1024x696.png


Ryzen-Zen-3-RAM-Ram-Speed-vs-FPS-5800X-Raibow-6-1024x687.png


Source: https://premiumbuilds.com/features/zen-3-ram-speeds-benchmark-analysis/
 
Associate
OP
Joined
22 Oct 2012
Posts
1,089
Even AMD said 3600Mhz was the sweetspot, if you can get it up to 4000 its probably better to run it 3600 with tighter timings.
I think originally they said '4GHz is to Zen 3 as 3.6GHz is to Zen 2' when it comes to sweetspots. They then failed to fab chips which hit that goal with previous BIOSes so here's hoping....
 
Associate
OP
Joined
22 Oct 2012
Posts
1,089
If the 5000 series uses the same IMC which they say it does I think 4000/2000 is going to be unicorn territory.

Not many chips will achieve it.

Probably what they have done with the 5000 series is make it more common for 3800/1900 speeds to be achieved compared to the 3000 series.
I could definitely achieve 3800/1900 with the old AGESA, so I think it's reasonable to hope for more if 1.2 does eventually get released.

BTW nice quote on your sig :) Ex navy or a fan of history?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom