Saul said:I have some temperature programs, and they mainly report different temperatures.
Which one do I believe?Code:Intel TAT: 48 CoreTemp: 45 The BIOS: 34 Everest: 32 SpeedFan: 35
Thanks in advance,
- dark0r.
Black Dragon said:The CPU temp is measured by a thermal diode on the CPU die, while core temps are measured by a digital thermal sensor near each core. The location of the two digital thermal sensors is significantly hotter than the location of thesingle thermal diode.
But even know that doesn't help with which of the temps we should be going by. If it's the CPU die temp then i'm fine, if its the sensor on the cores then i'm probably slowly boiling my cpu to death![]()
You should go by the internal core's temperature, because it's the more important one.Black Dragon said:Thats the thing though, speed fan is reading from both. You have the CPU temp then you have the internal core temps. Which one is the one that we should go by? Because right now Speedfan tells me my CPU is sitting at 35C idle and the internal core temps are 50C and 51C on each core.
Odd... Core Temp works perfectly fine on my Vista install. Have you tried running it with Windows XP SP2 compatability? (right click->properties->compatability tab).Black Dragon said:core temp just tells me driver fails to load and the the same message box just keeps appearing filling up my screen till i task manager out of it.
Black Dragon said:Oh is there a workaround to get TAT or Coretemp to work on Vista Ultimate 64? Neither of them work for me, core temp just tells me driver fails to load and the the same message box just keeps appearing filling up my screen till i task manager out of it. Tat when installed just makes the error noise and a box flashes up on the screen and disappears before i can read it. :/