Wondering if I can pick the brains of a Cisco expert or two...
I've inherited a bit of a hempen homespun solution at work that needs a bit of reconfiguring to say the least. Situation is as follows:
Two SG-500s in L2 mode, one upstairs and one downstairs. Connected via gig uplinks.
Two networks running over this, with a VM(!) bridging a third in:
Office LAN (contains servers too) - 10.x.x.x (standalone for all intents, DHCP from AD infra)
Phones - VoIP 192.x.x.x (DHCP helper needed from below)
Server Network 169.x.x.x (contains phone control host)
The network downstairs is going to have all 3 VLAN'd, have just about got my head around that. Did a port audit today, and I need to have a rejig to sort the messy rack out but I'm more or less happy with configuring everything and making it nice and organised.
What I'm not so sure about is presenting the 10.x.x.x & 192.x.x.x networks to the upstairs switch, which is just phones and desktops.
All machines are NAT, and connect to the Internet directly and not via a proxy. I'm considering changing this at a later date though.
If needs be I could make the following changes:
Repurpose old office/server LAN into pure server LAN - 10.x.x.x
Create two new VLANs for desktops:
Downstairs LAN - 10.0.1.x
Upstairs LAN - 10.0.2.x
Phones - VoIP 192.x.x.x (DHCP helper needed from below)
Server Network 169.x.x.x (contains phone control host)
However at this point I'd be happy to just have the existing networks presented as per the first option, all 3 downstairs and the office/phone LANs upstairs. I read something about trunking ports between the two switches to extend the VLAN from the downstairs master upstairs - am I thinking along the right lines...? Is this feasible, or am I way off?
Cheers in advance!
I've inherited a bit of a hempen homespun solution at work that needs a bit of reconfiguring to say the least. Situation is as follows:
Two SG-500s in L2 mode, one upstairs and one downstairs. Connected via gig uplinks.
Two networks running over this, with a VM(!) bridging a third in:
Office LAN (contains servers too) - 10.x.x.x (standalone for all intents, DHCP from AD infra)
Phones - VoIP 192.x.x.x (DHCP helper needed from below)
Server Network 169.x.x.x (contains phone control host)
The network downstairs is going to have all 3 VLAN'd, have just about got my head around that. Did a port audit today, and I need to have a rejig to sort the messy rack out but I'm more or less happy with configuring everything and making it nice and organised.
What I'm not so sure about is presenting the 10.x.x.x & 192.x.x.x networks to the upstairs switch, which is just phones and desktops.
All machines are NAT, and connect to the Internet directly and not via a proxy. I'm considering changing this at a later date though.
If needs be I could make the following changes:
Repurpose old office/server LAN into pure server LAN - 10.x.x.x
Create two new VLANs for desktops:
Downstairs LAN - 10.0.1.x
Upstairs LAN - 10.0.2.x
Phones - VoIP 192.x.x.x (DHCP helper needed from below)
Server Network 169.x.x.x (contains phone control host)
However at this point I'd be happy to just have the existing networks presented as per the first option, all 3 downstairs and the office/phone LANs upstairs. I read something about trunking ports between the two switches to extend the VLAN from the downstairs master upstairs - am I thinking along the right lines...? Is this feasible, or am I way off?
Cheers in advance!
