Royality said:
It is widely believed that the ability of a musician can be greatly influenced by whether or not they are a natural player but how much does this accentuate someones ability? Furthermore does 'natural' ability even mean that much compared to time spent playing an instrument or perhaps the intensity of someones interest in an instrument or music?
Throughout history there have been instances of prodigies, the possibility of you being one is very small and it seems some are just born to do what they do. There are those with natural talent above the average person. But whatever way you do need to learn and practice, common consensus is that it takes on average about 10 years to become very good at what you are doing if that be playing the piano or playing football.
What instruments do you guys all play and how long did it take for you to get reasonably good with them? Would you consider yourself a natural?
Personally I play The drums, the piano, the guitar; I am pretty awful at all of them, drums and guitar being the best out of the lot. I would never consider myself a natural I have had to work to get where I am.
If you play two or more instruments which was the hardest to learn?
This is always a hard one to answer they are all a pain in the arse in their different ways, I found with all of them, once you got over the initial hurdles of the instument such as co-ordination but also freedom of movement about the instrument things get easier and you progress. You hit walls from time to time as well which is annoying. Out of the lot I would say the drums were hardest to learn. But since you mentioned the drums I will say that they are great to play.
What do you think the best instrument is for creating music in terms of ease, quality of sound (is it nice?) and versatility of sound?
Probably the piano, it is the thing I learnt first and I think it is brilliant in the emotion you can get across as well as how well it teaches you to learn music. The quality of sound is down to
1) The listener - do they like that sound it is just like any music afterall
2) The player, obviously if they are crap then it isn't going to sound great.
3) The quality of the instrument, I think most people would agree a budget piano would sound very nasty compared to a Bechstein for instance.
Versatility is an interesting one, I would say all instruments are limitless because you can use them in whatever you wan't, it just so happens that certain instruments get used more than others because they may be better suited to a multiple of styles.
I want to learn 2 or more instruments so I can make my own music, whether or not this music is good or not is irrelevant (it will be crap ) and want an insight into how hard this will be but also which instruments would be best to learn.
Well it depends on the person, you may find it easy, you may find it very hard. It could be that you find each instrument feeds off the other. As to best to learn the only advice I think anyone can fairly give is that you learn what you want to play and can see being used in your music, you have an idea of what it sounds vaguely like I am sure.
Also does playing the drums require musical ability?
Certainly, although some fools might try and quantify that compared to the amount of ability required to play other instruments like the Cello or somthing. But you can't really compare imho.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc608/fc608ab6e6dc2469165c10f9a8cb020731d10c69" alt="Smile :) :)"